this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
348 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59314 readers
4719 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you compare the AI image that was used with the image that one the price after the artist enhanced it to that level you could argue that paintings from sketches are not copyright-able

[–] Dangdoggo@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if the sketch was made by the artist then no you can't, and if the sketch wasn't then the copyright board has a right to know, and he didn't disclose the original image.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Idk if he has shown the ai image (which isn't copyright-able) but it was discloed that AI was used in the process

[–] poppyxxx@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

He's allowed to copyright it as a collage, just not claim ownership to the source images.

When you say a painting from a sketch, what do you mean? Is it a sketch from another artist? If so, you can still copyright the painting, you just can't claim ownership of the sketch, because you didn't make it.