this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
968 points (93.8% liked)

Memes

45643 readers
1261 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
968
Murdoch never saw it coming (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Custoslibera@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
167 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

40-54 year olds were 7-21 years old in 1990. That group had >30% of wealth? I have some doubts about these charts.

[–] tmyakal@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's because you're reading the chart wrong. It's showing the change in wealth for those age brackets across time.

People that were 40 in 1990 had a bigger share of the wealth than people who are 40 in 2020.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see. Thank you.