22

Sometimes unused class or function manages to slip into code base. Static code checkers like ruff, flake8 does not have rules for detecting such globally unused code.

I tried using vulture, but it has too many false positives to have it as part of CI/CD pipeline.

I have tried to implement my own, more reliable check for global deadcode detection.

Please let me know what you think about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jnovinger@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Would also be nice if I could use some sort of pattern in the --ignore-names option. Apologies if that's already there and I missed it.

[-] niekas@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Great idea! I will add this feature shortly :)

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)

Python

6187 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

October 2023

November 2023

PastJuly 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS