this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
629 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2201 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I thought 74 Lashes were clearly lethal?

AFAIK there is nothing humane about such a sentence, on the contrary, it can mean slow and painful death.

I just tried to find this out, in most muslim countries, the too many lashes are spread out over several times, to avoid death. A limit is for example 50 lashes per time in Saudi Arabia.

[–] OhShitSon@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Absolutely, although I don't think barbarians were quite that bad.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wasn't barbarian just Roman slang for non Romans?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, but more specifically the non romans from the north.

[–] Armen12@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I think Barbarian comes from much later when the Barbary Pirates were kidnapping people and razing villages and towns to the ground and forcing people into slavery. I think "Goths" and "Vandals" would be more appropriate, but I could be wildly mistaken

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Obligatory I don't agree with the mess going on in Iran.

With that out of the way, there's a decent amount of restrictions on the lashing process to make the sentence painful but not lethal or permanently disabling. Lashing someone with all your strength and ripping the flesh off their back pre-Civil War America style isn't a thing., because ripping the flesh off people's backs tends to kill them.