this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
1320 points (97.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
411 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhllor@feddit.de 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Actually had a colleague who determined distances on microscopy images that way. She would measure the scale bar included in the image with her ruler on the screen, measure the distance she was interested in and calculate the distance using the rule of three. I mean, why bother using the measuring tool included in the software.

[–] sznio@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I've heard of people printing out charts, then cutting out the part they wanted to calculate an integral of, then weighing the paper.

[–] siipale@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard of it too. You would need an analytical balance to get accurate measurements weighing a piece of paper. Just cut out the part you want to take an integral of, then cut out a piece of paper with known size (or cut several pieces with different sizes to get more accurate results) and weigh each of them. I guess this used to be cheaper and faster than using computers when computers were big and expensive.

[–] jadero@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Or maybe just a powder balance. When I was a kid in the 1960s, Dad did a lot of reloading his own ammunition. We kids had fun doing things like weighing our names (weigh a small piece of paper to get the tare, weigh again to get the loaded weight, subtract) and other miniscule things. As I recall, it was accurate to less than a grain (0.065 gram).

One of the things we did was weigh different shapes of paper to calculate area. Start with a sample of a unit area. Cut out a funky shape and weigh it, then do the math.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Nono that's genius

..ignoring the part that it's just a discrete approximation of an integral a la a Riemann sum.

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jcg@halubilo.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How inaccurate is your scale?

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How precise are your scissors?

How funky is your chicken?

[–] Quereller@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I was reading an old book about chromatography in laboratory and they exactly describe this method to determine the amount of substance.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

That was a common way to do it before computers were common.

[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's pretty clever!

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

If it works it isn't stupid.

[–] thedolanduck@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing she didn't make any zoom either