this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
286 points (96.1% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

6 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 127 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Why do they keep giving the word "streamers" new meanings??

A streamer is someone who streams, as in Twitch streamers.
But for some reason they started using it about the streaming services and now it's also the people using streaming services to watch stuff..?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Breaking: Streamers renamed Ribbons, totally unrelated streamers are up in arms

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

What’s up, streams. You been streaming today? I stream every day, stream on brother

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did you know that the word "Run" has hundreds of definitions? Like, more then 600 depending on who you ask.

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

wow never thought about that!

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it in the running for most useful word, or have we just run out of words?

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago

I don't know, they should run some studies on it.

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I agree, I've always known them as subscribers, not streamers

[–] koreth@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Using it to describe streaming services isn't new. For example, here's a Variety article from 2019 that uses it that way.

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Let's discriminate the term further by calling the producer the "stream source" and the consumers the "stream sink".

We now have "sourcers" and "sinkers". Thank me later. Or don't.

[–] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the usage you're familiar with. But even if it was widely accepted at some point, the meaning can change over time. That's normal, that's what languages do. If you complain about shit like that, you sound like my 80 year old father.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Right, but part of that process is people thinking some of it is stupid and pushing back. Language isn't immune to the pressures that form it.

Likewise, just because you know how something works doesn't divorce you from the causal forces that bring it into being. The language changes because we change it. It's okay to try to do it actively.