this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
836 points (97.8% liked)

World News

32353 readers
342 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are you seriously comparing the responsible hunting of a sustainable number of minke whales to the deliberate genocide of an indigenous population?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll have to comfort eat to deal with the sadness. Where are the whale burgers?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So contrarian and edgy! You must rule 8th grade!

[–] Hankaaron@yall.theatl.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is no such thing as sustainable or responsible whaling.

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Believe what you want. You've already decided that you are both offended and correct, so there's nothing that anyone can say to change your mind. Just understand that not listening doesn't make you right, it makes you a zealot.

[–] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mink whaling is more responsible and sustainable than a lot of commercial fishing - compare the impacts of hunting a species that's classified as "least concern" with deep-sea trawling, the hunting of certain endangered species of tuna, or the use of the eggs and/or young spawn of endangered fish as caviar or whitebait!

Whaling definitely needs to go but (non-Antarctic) whaling gets an oversized amount of attention and it's not unusual for people who are opposed to it to be financially supporting even more destructive forms of kaimoana.

[–] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Simply being "not as bad" does not make it "good."

This is just providing masculine jobs for guys who won't do anything else, while enriching the terrible people who employ them. There's no use to whaling.

[–] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I very intentionally did not say that whaling is good, because it's not. However, I believe that it is hypocritical to call for the banning of Icelandic whaling without also applying the same zeal to banning other forms of harmful commercial seafood, and that whaling is somewhat used to distract from the harms of more "normal" seafood.

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Or just standard livestock farming. I personally think that if people want to eat meat they should have to kill the first animal they eat in order to get a licence to eat meat.

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Actually, Norway and Iceland have good gender equality. I'm pretty sure a lot of the whalers are women.

[–] spez_@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it's genocide. They're barbarians who need to be put in their place for killing whales. I support a coup on the government

[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

And if you lived in a country that has whaling there might be some legitimacy to your coup. But as it stands you're going to have to try to bribe the CIA to intervene on your behalf. Good luck paying them more than the Norwegian government does.