this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
177 points (99.4% liked)

Space

8702 readers
50 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Scientists have been working on models of planet formation since before we knew exoplanets existed. Originally guided by the properties of the planets in our Solar System, these models turned out to be remarkably good at also accounting for exoplanets without an equivalent in our Solar System, like super Earths and hot Neptunes. Add in the ability of planets to move around thanks to gravitational interactions, and the properties of exoplanets could usually be accounted for.

Today, a large international team of researchers is announcing the discovery of something our models can't explain. It's roughly Neptune's size but four times more massive. Its density—well above that of iron—is compatible with either the entire planet being almost entirely solid or it having an ocean deep enough to drown entire planets. While the people who discovered it offer a couple of theories for its formation, neither is especially likely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimeMuncher2@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s roughly Neptune’s size but four times more massive.

‽ Is it 4 times Neptune's size or roughly the same size?

[–] BandoCalrissian@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Massive in this context means the mass of the planet, not its radius. So it has the same radius (or volume, or takes up the same amount of space) as Neptune, but it has 4 times the mass (or 4 times the stuff inside of it).

[–] reflex@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

4 times the mass (or 4 times the stuff inside of it)

Get Marie Kondo on the horn.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Wait, have we confirmed it doesn't bring joy though?

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

They mean to say it's roughly Neptune's size but has 4 times the mass ( probably also beacause Neptune is a gas giant )

[–] scoggegg@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

They talk about its high density right after so I think they mean its volume is roughly the same as Neptune's but it has 4x as much mass.