this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
201 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
268 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A warning and a perspective from an insider who has been through this before.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nomecks@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Fediverse seems like a good place to implement a distributed, block chain based peering setup. Join a community and share the hosting

[–] QHC@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

OMG why do tech bros try to force blockchain into everything

[–] grue@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think less "Bitcoin" and more "Freenet." IMO the point shouldn't be to try to monetize stuff, it should be to decouple content from the instance it was posted on (i.e., to mirror popular content across instances to distribute the load) while still maintaining control and attribution for the user that posted it.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

But how does blockchain, as a technology, help with that? The Fediverse already has a mechanism for distributing content across multiple instances.

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

doesn't have to be blockchain based, but there should be some sort of incentive for people to take up the burden of hosting (and moderating, I guess) like blockchains have for people to run nodes, or instances will start shutting down eventually when the people who were footing the bill get tired of it. Or maybe I'm wrong and instances will survive on donations and goodwill of their moderators. I'm not sure how that'd work if communities get really big though

[–] Wizard@lemmy.dustybeer.com 1 points 1 year ago

I think at this point even tech bros hate people that try to insert the blockchain and cryptowhatever into everything.

[–] parrot-party@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

That's not going to work for web hosting. The only reason it works for crypto or folding is because each request takes minutes to run and there's no time dependence on returning the result. Additionally, they don't need much data and all data needed is dispersed with the task.

Websites are completely different. Each individual request is tiny, taking milliseconds to process. Each request is very time dependant, you have a person literally waiting for the result. But the biggest issue is that what people really want is stuff from a database. So that database would need up grant full access to everyone, meaning anyone could change whatever they wanted. Lastly, that database would need to be hosted anyway so you've gained nothing.

Don't suggest tech solutions when you don't have any idea what the problem or solution actually involves.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At a simple level- a lot of that happens already.

Moving around between communities is quite seamless, even though most of them are hosted on different servers, and even different parts of the world.