this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
126 points (93.2% liked)

Apple

17452 readers
74 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almightyGreek@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Like every year! Hopefully the usb-c rumours are true

[–] Introversion@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They absolutely, positively, 100% are true. I know this because for several years I’d been patiently not replacing my aging iPhone 7 until I could buy a model with USB-C and consolidate my device cables. Until this year, when its battery was finally dying literally ten minutes after unplugging it, and I bought an iPhone 14.

You’re welcome. 😅

[–] EliasChao@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago

Your sacrifice is appreciated, mate.

[–] DietBajaBlast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have two wireless chargers, they’re cheap and allow me to never have to plug mine in, ever. I think I have the 11

[–] bigdog_00@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are slower, produce more heat, and waste more energy. Not to mention the fact that you're actually more constrained on where you put the phone, you can't pick it up to use it while it continues charging. Wireless charging is worse than almost every way, save for the magsafe mounting system they developed. I'll give them credit, that's pretty handy, but in general I don't understand this push for wireless charging

[–] degrix@lemmy.hqueue.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MagSafe wireless chargers definitely let you pick them up and use the phone like you would when it’s plugged it. Wireless charging certainly has its drawbacks, but constrained usage seems like an odd angle.

For instance, a few months before my most recent trip I bought a nifty MagSafe battery pack from Anker that also came with a travel stand I could set up in my hotel room. I could let my phone sit on the stand or I could slide the battery pack out and use it like I normally would. It reminds me of the days where I could just swap my cell phones batteries.

[–] bigdog_00@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have the same setup for about a year, even bought a mag safe case for my pixel when I switched to GrapheneOS so I could keep using it. Portable batteries and charging mounts are great and all, but having a mag safe cable is totally pointless. It's still charges more slowly, produces more heat, and is less efficient. If you're going to be constrained by a wire you might as well just plug straight in

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I use my phone while it’s charging most of the time. For that reason alone, wireless charging has zero appeal to me. Could be cool on a car though.

[–] weedwhacking@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why didn’t you just change the battery?

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I need that connector to finish taking over my life.

[–] krische@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think the chances of that are pretty solid, but it will apparently still be USB 2.0 speeds.

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To be honest, I can’t remember the last time I used the lightning plug to transfer any data, so it’s not a current feature I will miss. But it’s a huge, missed opportunity for sure.

[–] krische@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed, not just seems like such an oddity. But I believe the new USB-C iPad is 2.0, so whatever "hack" they did for that is probably what they're doing for the iPhones. Seems almost like they rushed it with the incoming regulations.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

At the highest quality setting, the iPhone 14 Pro captures video footage that is 6 GB per minute. At USB 2.0 speeds, files can be transferred at around 3.6 GB per minute. Typical wifi direct/Airdrop speeds are about 3-5 GB per minute. And thunderbolt speeds are 100 times faster, at 5 GB/s or 300 GB/minute.

For some purposes that USB 2.0 speed would be a significant bottleneck. It's up to the buyer to decide whether those use cases are likely.

[–] kbotc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I bet the Pro uses Thunderbolt, and the regular is USB 2 speeds. Just my gut feeling. “You can hook up the pro to our special version of Logic Pro and edit directly on your phone! You can maybe move a your music library over to the non-pro in about 4 hours.”

[–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I hope the usb-c and SE4 rumors are true. Honestly all I need out of a phone, for me. My Pixel6a might start showing its age (barely) at that point.