this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
304 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
4447 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A security researcher has found it’s possible to reveal a Skype app user’s IP address without the target needing to even click a link. Microsoft said the vulnerability does not need immediate attention.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The attack could pose a serious risk to activists, political dissidents, journalists, those targeted by cybercriminals, and many more people.

Lmao like they're using Skype when trying to hide

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hello. I am evil hacker cyber criminal.

If you want to discuss terms, find me on Skype at EvilHackerCyberCriminalGuy69.

Do not be fooled by the 69, as while it can be seen as a joke, it is my birth year as the original name was taken.

Thank you.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I use 88 in stuff as well. I didn't realize until way to late that 88 is a nazi thing.

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Have to be honest, I thought Skype was discontinued years ago.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It was but we forgot to tell our grandparents, and Microsoft

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

somehow Emperor Skype returned

no matter how many times you say no it keeps coming back, same with Edge

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i did too. i’m genuinely not sure why it exists. microsoft is making teams into its favorite productivity app, and i can’t think of anything skype has that teams doesn’t. why does skype still exist?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because it sucks quite a bit less than Teams. I know I'll be sad to see it go when companies eventually switch to Teams. They're already running side by side in most places now while companies are migrating so it's only a matter of time. Microsoft will probably announce end of life sometime this year.

Skype basically bridged the time it took Microsoft to come up with their own conferencing solution so now that Teams is here to stay they can take Skype out back and shoot it.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't today's Skype just camouflaged Teams?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

It's possible it uses the same infrastructure in the background, but the interface is a lot simpler. It's just on-on-one conversations and group conversations period. The equivalent in Teams would be the "Chat" tab – if it didn't have all the added complexity that comes from Teams being so deeply integrated with the Microsoft online office suite (email, calendar, teams, sharepoint, onedrive and a billion other apps).

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

that makes a lot of sense. it is quite hard to make an app worse than teams, and it seems like the more time microsoft spends on their productivity apps the worse they get (ie word, which was pretty much finished in 2004). i haven’t used skype since finding out about mumble around 2013, but can definitely see why it might be nice to have an office meeting app that is (relatively) free from microsoft’s meddling.

[–] rar@discuss.online 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On a serious note, most of those people (activists, journalists, etc.) aren't exactly the computer savvy types, nor have the time or resource to spend learning about matters they seldom know about, and yet they are the ones that desperately need this knowledge. They might have an important message to be sent. What would you use to spread the message in their shoes?

Sure, we the tech guys, especially subscribed to privacy related communities, can talk about Tor browser or threat modeling all day. But have you tried bring that up in social circles, if any?

Non tech minded activists will simply use the tools at their disposal: messaging apps? sure; social media apps, if looking for message amplification, whatever it runs on their cheap android phone. Metadata? IP? Profiling? Browser fingerprinting? Some are aware of it, as they also had to endure internet censorship growing up. It's a trade they make knowingly or unknowingly between the cause and their physical and mental health.

We can laugh at their ignorance all we want, but this is how we become the Ivory tower that fuels resentment.