this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
21 points (78.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43851 readers
675 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A artist/creator putting a price tag on their creative work is monetization.
A big pharma insulin maker charging diabetics 5x what they should because they know there's high demand and people will literally die if they don't fork up the cash is exploitation.
Monetization is assigning economic value to an physical asset.
Exploitation is artificially inflating the economic value of a resource necessary for survival and forcing a population of people into a position where they must give all of their generated value just to live. People need food, water, shelter, and sometimes life sustaining medicine. Most other things are nice convinences but entirely optional. Putting a million dollar price tag on an art piece isn't exploitation, putting a 100$ price tag on a gallon of water would be.
Well said. I would still say, that exploitation can also happen with things not necessary for survival. Say a TV or a viral app. If a company finds something that sells at a very high markup and then uses that to get rich, it's exploitation, if the conical does not need the money. Of course, they could e.g. donate it, then it's fine. But if it just goes into the pocket of the owner, it's exploitation.