Archived version: https://archive.ph/7EVMt
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230825172835/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66602814

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think this may already be illegal. You would be inciting and degrading members of a legal religion in Denmark, which has been against the law there since 1939. Blasphemy Laws were taken off the books in 2017, but this is a step back in that same direction. But then there is amendments to the constitution, I don't fully understand.

[–] mintyfrog@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hinduism often has a belief in, "sanctity of the cow, ... the belief that the cow is representative of divine and natural beneficence and should therefore be protected and venerated" (Brittanica).

One could argue that eating beef is inciting and degrading to [probably a select few] members of Hinduism.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The difference is Hindus won't murder you.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I like this talking point

[–] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well plated beef is divine.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think there's a difference between eating beef in a place where that's the norm and eating beef at a group of people to make them angry or mock them.

[–] mintyfrog@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But for the Quran, "in public" is sufficient to meet the standard of "at" them?