this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
342 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Finally getting some (closer to) mainstream video cards from AMD. Still feels overpriced but a lot better than $750 for a 7900xt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meh, nothing like having the official AMD video drivers crashing several times a day on Ubuntu with a flagship Sapphire RX 7900 XTX. And if you're extra lucky it will kick you out of the session too.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would you use the official ones? Mesa is better

[–] dark_stang@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't think I've had a single crash with the mesa drivers after my overclock was dialed in. And I've ran some pretty janky stuff (like my vega 56 that was flashed with a 64 bios).

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you talking from personal experience? If so, I might give them a try.

I tought AMD official drivers where the best option for graphics and performance.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, personal experience, but also from benchmarks, the open source mesa drivers are just faster at this point, unless you're turning on raytracing in everything.

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, I may play around with raytracing in the future, but it's not a must for me.

Well, I will give the open source drivers a try, thanks.

[–] CreativeTensors@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is ROCm these days? I remember needing the official AMD drivers for OpenCL stuff a while ago and ROCm was in very early development.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For ROCm you need the official drivers. For OpenCL, RustiCL (OpenCL implemented over Vulkan) works perfectly for me.

[–] deepthaw@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How are Intel's drivers? My new PC has an A750 because I like to live dangerously. It's been great in Windows for the few games I want to play (the older stuff that has performance issues with Arc I'm largely not interested in or can play on my old PC)

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I don't know. I ended up with a full AMD build.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Intel has historically had very good Linux drivers. Last time I checked (8 months ago), there were still some bugs when the cards were new, but I'm sure they're mostly ironed out by now.

[–] d3Xt3r@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The drivers themselves are fine, but the problem is game compatibility. Several games require you to fake your card vendor so that the game thinks you're on nVidia or something, but even then, there may be some compatibility issues.

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-Graphics-Hogwarts-Legacy