299
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sekki@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Experiments reveal PV-leaves generate over 10% extra electricity compared to standard solar panels, which dissipate 70% of solar energy.

So basically you go from using 30% of solar energy to 33%? Sounds nice but would that really do that much?

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It's not just a 10% increase in productivity, it produces fresh water as a byproduct:

Furthermore, the photovoltaic leaf is capable of synergistically utilising the recovered heat to co-generate additional thermal energy and freshwater simultaneously within the same component, significantly elevating the overall solar utilisation efficiency from 13.2% to over 74.5%, along with over 1.1 L/h/m2 of clean water.

[-] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

where does the salt go? wouldn't it build up in the pipes and cause them to get clogged?

[-] IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Another commenter summarized the nature article linked in comments... Yes, the salt is left in the pipes, so they are flushed out at night to prevent buildup.

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Only if the water evaporates within the pipes?

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1.1l/h/m2 ? That means 25m2 generate 27.5l/h so 660l a day. That's huge.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

You're assuming full production for 24 hours a day, I don't think that's likely. Maybe 8 hours of full production a day under optimal conditions? Still, ~200 liters a day of potable water seems quite big for a 5x5 area of solar panels.

[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, my bad. Your estimate seems more likely.

[-] Sekki@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Thats pretty cool, although that is not even mentioned in the article unless Im missing something.

The article is extremely light on detail

That bleeping lobster linked the actual paper

https://lemmy.world/comment/2756145

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's easier to see the impressiveness of it when you realize that it collects 10% more energy than the current designs on the market. Yeah, that's a huge jump. Typically you only see less than 1-2% jumps in any given technology unless you develop a really novel approach (which is what this seems like).

[-] teamonkey@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t make sense to think of it in terms of how much of the Sun’s energy it uses because solar energy is essentially free and unlimited, it comes from an outside system, we don’t need to mine it or carry it or anything and we can’t ‘waste’ it in the same way we can other fuels. All it tells us is the maximum theoretical limit.

10% more energy from solar means a rooftop array could generate an extra 300-500W which is a genuinely useful amount of energy.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
299 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS