this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
1255 points (99.0% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2174 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Burning fields and forests is called back burning . It’s a practice that is saving the forest. If you don’t, the burning forests gets out of hand and all is lost. Just ask Australia circa 2019 when the PM refused to do the needed.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a very different thing to clear cutting, it's like saying dumping toxic waste in your fish pond is the same as feeding them.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wasn’t responding to the clear cutting. I was responding to the burning. I don’t know what you’re on about but way to mangle a topic.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok let me explain in more detail, there is what you describe of back burning which exists in some places but there is also the widely practiced method of clear cutting which often involves burning down the forest to get rid of it and create farm land. Did you not see all the stories about deforestation in Brazil using this method?

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, I said backburning. Glad we finally agreed what words mean now.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

And you said it to correct someone that didn't use that specific phrase, hence why I pointed out your mistake

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TIL deforestation of the Amazon is good for the Amazon.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Calm down. you either clearly cannot understand the differences or refuse to understand the differences of back burning and deforestation. And until you do you should stop speaking on the subject of ‘what is good for the world’ cuz clearly you are doing it in a very bad actor/sensationalist way.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

burning fields and forests is called back burning

Not always. Sometimes it's deforestation. Most often throughout human history, it's been deforestation

You're talking nonsense man

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said backburning. I didn’t stutter.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't have to stutter to be wrong.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nor argue the wrong argument and not have a clue what words mean.