this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
707 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
493 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The extra .9 cent we pay for every gallon of gas in the USA.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have about the cheapest gas in the western world and you complain about a few extra cents?

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It’s 0.9 cents! Per gallon!

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

In Canada the decimal after the cents is part of the screen and changes rather than being fixed at .9

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's say they outlawed it

Do you think:

A:They round up

B:They round down

In reality, it might save us .1 cent

[–] williams_482@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not the figure that's the problem, but the fact that Americans have been forced to accept this sort of casual deception in how the price of a standard good is advertised. Why is it okay that getting gas for "$3.50" per gallon (to quote the most visible price, which everyone will mention in conversation and mentally reference for comparison) is actually very slightly less than $3.51 per gallon? Just post the correct bloody price, in a clear and unambiguous manner, without faffing around with extra decimals that everyone mentally filters out anyway. It's stupid.

Same deal with American businesses consistently citing pre-tax (and where relevant, pre-tup) prices. Just tell people what the fuck they are actually going to pay, instead of agreeing that literally everyone has to make their pricing an exercise in consumer deception or be beaten out by everyone else's smaller-looking-but-actually-identical prices.

This whole thing is just another tiny window into why unregulated markets suck.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

It's scummy but not a scam

Personally, I like the pre-tax amounts displayed. I should know that I am paying 10 dollars for a shirt and that the government is taking an extra dollar. Rather than just being told, the shirt costs 11 dollars. Price tag saying 10+1 would be fine, but tax should always be displayed. Taxes shouldn't be hidden.

[–] Doesnotexist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It should be much more. A dollar a gallon tax.

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Making cars mandatory fucks over working class people.

The government should stop subsidizing driving and put that money into a form of transportation that doesn't require 10k a year for citizens to participate.

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"bro, just spend trillions of dollars on new infrastructure that will take decades to complete, while financially crippling poor people"

you wonder why no one likes you

[–] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ebike subsidies take no time. Increaseing bus frequencies is a bit faster (depending on local job markets). Painting bike gutters is pretty fast. Putting some traffic cones for modal filters is pretty fast.

It's true that this change will be tough for poor people who bought cars in the short term. But it's good for poor people who didn't buy cars in the short term (which is a lot of people with the most need). And good for all poor people in the long term.

If you want to help poor people, subsidizing an antisocial form of transportation that some poor people use is not a good choice.

[–] Doesnotexist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Don't worry I like you.

[–] SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how would we have roads??

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not referring to the federal road tax , but the $0.009 in the price.

The US actually has a legal denomination that is 1/10 of a cent, called a mill. It's 1/1000 of a dollar. It's very rarely used, and was never actually minted. The closest we had were 1/2 cent coins (5 mills), but those were short lived coin denominations in the 1700's.

So, why do gas stores get to use mills in their prices? I don't know, but I'm sure they do it either for a legal reason that outdated, because they get to derive extra profit per transaction, or because it's an extreme form of the Β’99 advertising trick.

In any of those cases it's really annoying.

[–] sulfate7016@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Well the federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, and the state gas tax where I am is 28.5 cents per gallon, for a total of 46.9 cents per gallon, that's where the $0.009 comes from.

It mattered a lot 100 years ago when gas was like 5.5 cents a gallon.