this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
95 points (86.3% liked)

General Discussion

12058 readers
179 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There are two wug

Because wug are like moose.

Unless it's weg, like goose and geese.

Also, I'm kinda cheating because I've seen this before. The first time I saw it, I said wugs, which is exactly the point of the test.

If you ever get a chance, take a look at the other parts of the test. There's multiple places where the kind of exceptions I used above would be available, but (and this is part of the point) the age of person the test was meant for wouldn't have been exposed to those exceptions yet. And those exceptions are exceptions, which even adults don't always think of when faced with this kind of thing. Like I said, my first thought when I initially saw this back in the day was "wugs", not any of the exceptions you'd think of given time. And I play word games where that kind of thing matters.

[–] virku@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I like to think that my English is quite good, but this one threw me off. Am I supposed to understand from the name wug that the plural of wug is not wugs?

Edit: if plural of wug is wug, then why isn't plural of rug rug, but rugs? Or am I mistaken there as well?

[–] zaphod@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a nonsense word, there's no right or wrong plural for it, most will say wugs, just like you did and that's the entire point of this test.

[–] virku@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh I see. Thanks!

Love your user name by the way. I should have thought to grab a reference like that while the user count is low.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly what the guy with two heads said :)

[–] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can simply look for an instance where that username is not taken yet… there are 1400 instances, though not all joinable or desirable, and some surely have a zaphod already… but it is really easy to obtain the exact username you desire.

[–] virku@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wouldn't have to be that exact name though. Any H2G2 reference would be cool, like vogon, agrajag or something. But I see what you mean about just creating the same name on a different lemmy instance. I guess that's an aspect of the fediverse I hadn't thought about.

[–] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

For sure! I briefly debated using a different reference, but the explanation works nicely with that example given that it’s already taken at least once.

[–] offbyone@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Given this link, the expected response is 'wugs'.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's one of the interesting things about language. It's all just sounds that we agree represent ideas.

But, because language use is such an intrinsic part of our brains, the rules around language are picked up much faster than we realize. This test is generally done with very young children that haven't had much (if any) grammat traint. They just pick you that adding s to the end of a noun means that there are multiple of if. They'll use that rule even when the noun is nonsense.

But that rule is arbitrary to an extent. We could collectively agree that adding k at the end means plural. It doesn't even have to be at the end, it could be anywhere in the word.

Some words don't follow the normal rules. Like mouse, and mice when talking about the animals. Or the exceptions I mentioned earlier.

If we apply those exceptions to a nonsense noun like wug, it is no more or less "right" than adding s. But the test is about showing how language develops, not how a given language functions.

English is an odd language sometimes though. We borrow words from other languages, sometimes adopting the grammar and rules, sometimes not. But English is built on multiple older languages to begin with, so the rules it has can be mind boggling.

[–] Kierro@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I also wanted to add another aspect to this test:
The difference between wug-s (voiced fricative, sounds like z) and wug-s (unvoiced, sounds like s).

As an example:
Dogs (dog/z/)
Cats (cat/s/)

The same pluralization rule is applied to both words, but the actual sounds made are different depending on the voicing of the previous sound/letter. You can feel the 'voicing' (vibration) of different sounds by putting your hand on your throat while saying these words.

Also fun fact I have a tattoo of a wug :)

[–] virku@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Norwegian is also borrowing a lot of words from other languages like that. Lots of our words are in English as well. Our grammar is similar that way that we have differences in the ending structure for some of those borrowed words, but I only think we do that for verbs.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a dog with QUIRKS on him. He is all covered in QUIRKS. What kind of a dog is he? He is a QUIRKSOME dog.

A man who 'zibs' is a ZIBSTER.