this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
401 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At least, some of the recent controversies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] President_Pyrus@feddit.dk 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Of course it is. But admitting errors and avoiding to make them again is a pretty effective form of damage control, and it is the kind we should want from any company.

[–] grognardish@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is the founder is still a thin-skinned whiny jerk that made it about 'his poor feelings' and doubled down.

When everyone else in a video is doing the right thing, and the founder is not, you can bet there's a huge toxic culture that a dedicated, but peripheral group is trying to work around - and Madison's tweets show that there's a hell of a lot more toxicity than just their ethical and editorial failings.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The problem is the founder is still a thin-skinned whiny jerk that made it about ‘his poor feelings’ and doubled down.

That's not at all what happened, and I think you're seriously lacking empathy here. He explained he reacted emotionally, and he's still emotional. This is in no small part his baby. He made the decision to step down before this ever happened because he wanted someone that could do it better at the helm, he realized he had been promoted past his competency, that's not nothing.

People just love drama...

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, well, that's one way to attempt to rewrite history. Either you are uninformed, misinformed, or delusional. I suggest you read some of the LTT related topics on the front page.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Try just watching the video. Linus is to my eye being extremely genuine.

I don't get the absurd crusade to crucify someone one barely knows for a situation one barely understands in the name of what... Some self indulgent moral superiority?

It happens every time. "Big publicly recognized figure/company/whatever makes a mistake" and everyone wants their life ruined, speculates to infinity and beyond, and writes off their humanity, etc. And it's happening over increasingly trivial things.

It's an internet mob out on a witch hunt and it's disgusting. This dude and his wife built a company from nothing that has been good to many many people from everything I've taken in over the years. They didn't kill anyone, they screwed up some data in a YouTube video, an employee sold something they shouldn't have (which Linus then tried to rectify), and some allegations have been made without proof by one former employee with no information from the LTT side (and no proof Linus or his team knew anything about the situation or its severity). Meanwhile, y'all are out here screaming for the demise of the whole damn thing, and to screw any second chances. It's a completely disproportionate and unjustified response.

I absolutely hate to see people treat other people in this way.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is tons of info in this thread about what happened. None of that was a mistake.

Apparently you are just misinformed and seem to have no will to take in the relevant information, which renders your opinion on the matter meaningless.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe you should offer him an actual coutner-argument, instead of just saying "You're wrong and uninformed". You're not even presenting an opinion on the story at all, which is even more meaningless than his actually relevant comments.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

The onus is not on me to inform him when he can scroll up and find the original gamers Nexus video, the LTT response, etc.

His arguments have absolutely no basis. There is no point engaging with someone who refuses to inform themselves on all the very public information that is available. Especially when it can be gleaned by nearly zero effort

[–] QHC@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While also monetizing the video and plugging their merch, in direct contrast to GN not monetizing the original video that started this whole thing. Absolutely brutal move there.

[–] lloram239@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

GN not monetizing the original video

GN monetized their follow up video just the same, pure drama for clicks about a total non issue. But Internet loves this shit. That GN likes to put huge focus on not monetizing and playing "holier than thou"-card isn't exactly a good look either.

[–] Voyajer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

GN's follow up video is actually their normally scheduled news vid that happens to address Linus' poor reaction.