Asklemmy

43950 readers

784 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

277

Do you donate to Wikipedia? Why or why not? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by bc3114@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Every so often I give a few bucks(far less than the worth of knowledge I got from it)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they adopt ads, it'll not be long before the articles themselves are influenced by who their advertisers are. Can't offend Advertiser A, so let's just delete that line in the article about them.

I think it's important that it remains ad free.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That brings me to the issue I was referring to though. It's already influenced. The advertising catch-22 isn't the only way to fall into this trap.