this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
59 points (98.4% liked)

Science

13257 readers
24 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] athos77@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As the airline industry pushes and waits for more sustainable fuels and alternative power engines, many major carriers have shifted focus to the emerging field of studying contrails, once considered an innocent byproduct of water vapor at high altitudes. But those whispy clouds are actually a significant environmental detriment because they hold heat in the atmosphere that would otherwise escape. [...]

The initial trial tested 70 flights, modifying flight paths to try to avoid conditions with altitudes, weather and humidity where they thought contrails were most likely to form. They were able to cut down on contrail coverage by about 54%, based on Google's satellite imagery. But those flights had to use about 2% more fuel to gain the results.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So does a 54% reduction in trails offset the 2% higher carbon emissions?

[–] Freeman@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Probably hard to measure as the contrails stay in the atmosphere for hours and the CO2 stays there for what, hundreds or thousands of years?