Linux

48152 readers

758 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

109

Is it worth switching to BTRFS for the average user? (aussie.zone)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Zozano@aussie.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm having trouble understanding all the benefits of BTRFS and how they'll apply to me.

Copy on Write and auto-compression seem like they will free up a bit of space.

What other practical benefits will I see from using BTRFS? Are there any noticeable performance benefits?

I use my computer to dual-boot. I don't need snapshots because I have a custom script for a fresh install. I use my PC for gaming and work. I've got an NVMe, two SSD's and one HDD.

Thanks in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me, snapshots are the best part of BTRFS because you can easily roll back bad updates without doing a fresh install. It might not be worth reinstalling for, but there's no reason not to on your next install.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I know it's all in my head, but there's something about a fresh install that gives me comfort.

I do a fresh install every few months when something starts behaving funky and it's normally faster than figuring out what's wrong.

Snapshots just don't have the same appeal to me lol

[–] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You do a fresh install every couple months? Damn. I'm using the same install from like... 7 years ago? Which was also 3 laptops ago. I just keep copying the install partitions from one laptop drive to the next.

There is definitely something rewarding to figuring out an issue and fixing it, vs starting from scratch every time. Also, you realistically shouldn't be having serious issues every few months, unless you're running a rolling distro like arch and there's issues with packages. I do think a bit of that might be in your head,or you're experiencing some weird hardware issues/failure.

[–] baraan@lemmy.tanktrace.de 1 points 1 year ago

Switched hardware on my home server last week and moved to proxmox. My Ubuntu installation that was running before that was installed 2011.

[–] 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

the main advantage of snapshots is how fast it happen, in two reboots with little to no wait time you can get your system back