“People think, increasingly it appears, that we shouldn’t be doing this. Well, let me start by saying we haven’t lost a single American in this war,” McConnell said. “Most of the money that we spend related to Ukraine is actually spent in the US, replenishing weapons, more modern weapons. So it’s actually employing people here and improving our own military for what may lie ahead.”

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/4085063

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even some otherwise good regular leftists have absolute dogshit takes on Ukraine. It's like they're allergic to even being coincidentally on the same side as the US State Department that they start falling all over themselves to be like "Remember guys, US Bad," and start like saying that we should be pushing Ukraine to give up territory to appease Russia so they don't use nukes. When we already know because of Crimea that Putin will almost certainly just regroup and try again if they give him anything.

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, I couldn't understand it, because to most NATO members, NATO is the backbone of their security, but I've realised that many lefties' reaction to NATO is akin to atheists' emotional-dogmatic view of religion: They're ever suspicious, never forgive nor forget past crimes, they reject all redeeming qualities and twist themselves to oppose benefitting them at the axiom level.

[–] mim@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I would say most leftists (specially the libertarian type), are not on the side of Russia on this.

Tankies have just been really loud with their mental gymnastics lately.

[+] krolden@lemmy.ml -9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

OK so you're siding with the state dept on Ukraine but when was the last time you agreed with usa foreign policy around the world? Why do you think they're in any way acting on behalf of anyone in eastern Europe?

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I don't think there's been another time once in the twenty plus years that I've been concerned with politics have I agreed with the position of the state department. But to me that means that I for damn sure am not about to interrupt them when they're finally for once in my life taking the morally correct action in funding the defense of Ukraine. I'll save that for when they inevitably get back on their bullshit thanks.

[–] Jmdatcs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So because the US has pulled a bunch of bullshit over the last several decades they shouldn't get involved when there is a real evil to fight? That's a boneheaded take. What if it was actual real Nazis? What if Nazis got ahold of a country in Europe and started invading and putting people into death camps? Should the US just say "I don't know man, we've fucked up in the middle east, south America, and southeast Asia so much we're just going to sit this out"?

Yes, western imperialism is bad. No, everyone opposed to western imperialism is not necessarily good.

Think of it as broken clock being right twice a day. Think of it however you need to. Russia needs to lose in Ukraine. And if that means the west gets a propaganda "win", that sucks but just deal with it. Western countries getting egg on their faces isn't worth letting Russia rape, murder, and steal.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And here it is, perfect example.

[–] False@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Whataboutism