this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
276 points (84.5% liked)

science

14878 readers
26 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are you even trying to say

[–] Lammy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no objectively falsifiable hypothesis, or imperially reproducible result.

Don’t bring science into politics, that’s what religions and governments have tried to do for years as part of propaganda / anti-science campaigns. It never goes well even if you think it’s morally correct, because scientific reality does not always align with, nor does it care about current morality. Nevertheless science is objectively true.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are falsifiable hypotheses in this study.

Here's the study. Go get access to the full text and read it https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2808129

[–] Lammy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Emotions (like regret) are not falsifiable, because they are not scientific phenomena. Similarly, you cannot have a scientific study on whether art is good, or if god is real, because they are by definition unscientific phenomena. That is why unscientific studies like this post, should not be allowed in a forum on science.

But perhaps the more important point here, is that conflating unscientific matters with actual science, has been at the heart of the anti-science movement, since science was discovered. It makes it much easier to discredit all of science as a whole, when you start claiming that social studies is science.

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You truly have no idea what you're talking about with regards to science, hypotheses, and how they work.

[–] Lammy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m curious what you think the scientific method is

[–] mrpants@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You should look it up for yourself if you don't think subjective experiences can be defined and measured in an objective and falsifiable way.

You could, for example, conduct a falsifiable experiment related to people's perception of color or heat or their night vision.

[–] Lammy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Subjective, by definition, cannot be objective. It sounds like you’re talking about social studies.