11
What the h... (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by sysadmin@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Top 1% is roughly half a mil annually from what I've heard, so perhaps mostly not. According to o-net, most MDs make less than half that.

My shitty point stands though, I think - if we start stealing rich people's jobs, there will be a lot more talk of fairness in automation.

[-] klangcola@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah fair enough. My point was also that not even doctors are 1%ers.

Inequality is so bad already, and as usual the benefits go to those who own the means of production, but AI is so capital intensive very few will get a seat at that table. And unlike previous automation revolutions, AI is on track to progress VERY quickly and VERY widely

AI may never replace X profession, but with AI 1 professional can be as productive as 3 professionals. What will the other 2 do?

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I have hope. If just one open source LLM with a commercial license gets released (as I hear Meta is considering), that levels the playing field a little for the rest of us.

Inequality is so intense these days. Probably the worst it's ever been in history, uncharted waters. AI is going to make it worse before it even has a chance to make it better. My original remark was too glib, so, sorry about that. I don't have easy answers for this uncorked genie.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
11 points (76.2% liked)

Memes

45190 readers
4212 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS