hanrahan

joined 2 years ago
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/16014827

Three leading climate scientists have combined insights from 10 global climate models and, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), conclude that regional warming thresholds are likely to be reached faster than previously estimated.

Mmmm faster then expected huh ?

 

Three leading climate scientists have combined insights from 10 global climate models and, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), conclude that regional warming thresholds are likely to be reached faster than previously estimated.

Mmmm faster then expected huh ?

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Perhaps WISE? You can use the web page unlike Revolut.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

So Degrowth.

Similar to Professor Kevin Anderson.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

CEOs are just doing their job

So where the guards at Auschwitz, they had families to support, acted lawfully etc.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago

First order, 2nd order or third order becomes an issue as you point out, gun deaths assigned to Winchester or to the shooter or to the Governments who allows legislation for it to happen ? ? Another example, cigeratte smoke, contact from particulates on residuals left on inanimte objects (3rd order) kills thousands of people, whose "fault"? Should you approach anyone seen smoking and rightly accuse them of manslaughter for third order impacts ? Or just shoot them becase it's a "greater good" ?

I read an article once on how much Artic ice the average American melted annually though car emissions, how many do they kill through car manslaughter vs car pollution, is that then treated like gun deaths? Assigned to Ford or Toyota, or to the individual ? What about voters who choose not to elect politicians who then support car use reduction via public and alterate transport even if they dont drive themselves ?

No train driver delivering inmates to Auswitch killed anyone but we hold them somewhat responsible, not the company making the trains not those building the trains.

What about those working in ammunition factories suppying Israel ? Vicarious liability is a thing. Just rhe CEO ?

Is the wife who shoots her abusive husband responsible? What about the "terrorist" from Afghanistan who had their family whiped out by a US combatant and bombs a Mall in the US ? Revenge, or justice, or ? Should the US Army be held responsbile for it ? The Government? the voters ?

I don't think it's a slippery slope, I think it's impossible to calculate and i don't think theres any solution. I do think a bunch of people will hold wildly differing opinions eg i think the Unabomber was right and justified and Manson was wrong ... for another example. Was a terrorist like Washington right ? Only becase he won.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

Grew up on enthusiast BBS, Lemmy is like a bunch of them are linked up.

Dislike for profit internet as it must inevitably lead to enshitification, just never had a term for that in the past :)

I don't have an issue with "toxicity" as i just ignore it, like a dog shit on the side walk. I prefer the "BBS/Usenet format" to Twitter like Mastodon though I am over on Masto and had been there for many years. I don't participate much though.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 days ago

Warm clothes and an electric blanket at night to go to sleep. I keep my body warm not the house.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 19 points 5 days ago

It's why we invented the gulliotine

 

If fossil fuels keep burning at present rates, we are headed for apocalyptic civilisational collapse. Perhaps even more strangely, there is no longer much serious disagreement about this claim.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 days ago

Whenever were asked at a voting booth to select a move towards doing something, we chose the opposite.

Surely it's clear by now we give no fucks beyond a modicum of pearl clutching ? We're still flying and driving cars, catching cruise ships, pleasure water craft, private jets blah blah blah

Four panel cartoon showing a male climate scientist talking to a woman who implores him to give her hope, he explains emissions need to be cut drastically and tells her she can help by riding a bicycle, she responds by saying she'd rather die.

 

$200bn wave of new gas projects could lead to a “climate bomb” equivalent to releasing the annual emissions of all the world’s operating coal power plants, according to a report.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Sort of related here in Australia

https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/greens-to-call-news-corp-execs-to-greenwashing-inquiry-over-gas-ads-20241204-p5kvrc.html

The Greens will call News Corp Australia executives to appear before a Senate inquiry into greenwashing over a series of front pages promoting gas without clearly disclosing a commercial relationship with gas companies.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually, the US has cut emissions already.

Only via dodgy accounting, Defence arent counted, international flights, international shipping etc aren't counted at all. Then there is the entire issue that outsourced emsision are ignored, they will go up again if onshoring occurs. Outsourced emissons are worse becase of shipping which isn't counted at all.

The dodgy accounting is deliberate as Deiter Helm explains.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/forget_kyoto_putting_a_tax_on_carbon_consumption

We're doing noting to reduce emissions except LARPing. This isnt a tech problem, it's a behavioural one. Closing aiports, banning private cars, banning cruise ships, cutting the military in 1/2 are solutions ebwryhibg eise is just posturing.

Bit I've had this debate with you a decade ago on Reddit and since then the Keeling curve keeps rising an rising.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

We're not idiots.

Hnmm, I'd argue we are.

 

This melting will lead to a rise in sea levels of up to one metre, threatening millions of people in coastal areas.

That's just from Greenlands ice sheets (by 2100)

This is on point as well

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2024/11/29/an-eighth-of-an-inch-in-how-long/

 

Article is mostly how to profit of human stupidity but I thought this quote was salient and on topic. Not new for people who have paid attention though but a reminder.

"[The world] will have to produce approximately a billion tonnes of copper metal in the next 25 years to meet net zero targets," he said.

That is more copper than has ever been produced.


Clean energy might help deal with emissions, but it does nothing to reverse deforestation, overfishing, soil depletion and mass extinction. A growth-obsessed economy powered by clean energy will still tip us into ecological disaster.” - Jason Hickel

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15730879

Land degradation is expanding worldwide at the rate of 1m sq km every year, undermining efforts to stabilise the climate, protect nature and ensure sustainable food supplies, a study has highlighted.

The degraded area is already 15m sq km, an area greater than Antarctica, the scientific report says, and it calls for an urgent course correction to avoid land abuse “irretrievably compromising Earth’s capacity to support human and environmental wellbeing”.

Seems unlikely that anything will be done then as we stroll purposefully and knowingly off the Seneca Cliff of civilisations collpase.

 

Land degradation is expanding worldwide at the rate of 1m sq km every year, undermining efforts to stabilise the climate, protect nature and ensure sustainable food supplies, a study has highlighted.

The degraded area is already 15m sq km, an area greater than Antarctica, the scientific report says, and it calls for an urgent course correction to avoid land abuse “irretrievably compromising Earth’s capacity to support human and environmental wellbeing”.

Seems unlikely that anything will be done then as we stroll purposefully and knowingly off the Seneca Cliff of civilisations collpase.

 

Donald Trump has said many times in the last few months that because of global warming, sea level will rise an eighth of an inch in several hundred years...

He usually follows by adding that “we’ll have more beachfront property.”

It is just about the stupidest thing one could possibly say about sea level rise.

 

A recent interview with on of the few Adults in the "Climate Debate", Professor Kevin Anderson.

 

New research shows that climate models underestimate regional heating by large margins

view more: next ›