Never heard anyone arguing over the ethics of the mining of lapis lazuli, and i think slavery and human misery trump plagerism.
So if ethics define art then DaVinci, Michelangelo, etc are not artists
Never heard anyone arguing over the ethics of the mining of lapis lazuli, and i think slavery and human misery trump plagerism.
So if ethics define art then DaVinci, Michelangelo, etc are not artists
I believe there is a good chance it will be reversed on appeal and ultimately backfire against the Energy Transfer pipeline company.
Oh you sweet summer child....
I think you mean presidential pardons
I'm not cherry picking Im just telling you my personal experience and the town I live in
I only hear people talking about Reddit on Lemmy to be honest
Because having a bus to pick up 7 people in a day is really efficient economically and environmentally...
Sorry to break it to you but Americans are identified by sound way before they are identified by sight
I used self-hosted rocket chat before, now I use teams, I understand perfectly all the hate
Don't we?
No one is making excuses, I'm just pointing out the hipocrisy of saying that the art is less valid because of the tools used.
And yes, I believe a person who has an artistic idea but not the skills to represent it should be able to do it though AI, just writing a prompt doesn't make it art just like drawing a sunflower very realistically doesn't make it art. Is music less art because it's made with a synth or in Ableton?