Yeah, I was very dissapointed by that as well. As far as I'm aware, the only time it matters is when

Yeah, stuffing more worms into your brain being purely a beneficial mechanic with no drawbacks is a very weird choice. This whole system was honestly better in early access than it ended up being, having the tadpoles be just a dialogue option with a very easy check but consequences the more you used them. The ring that Omeluum gives you was even supposed to help, only to get changes into a boring Charm resistance ring on release.

This looks much better than the last trailer, I appreciate how so many of the animations are clearly inspired by the janky but charming original ones. My biggest complaint from the Teaser was the overly talkative player character. Don't turn the Nameless Hero into your bog standard "must comment on literally everything that happens" character so many modern games have.

I'll reserve my final judgment until 2nd of August and the THQ Nordic Showcase but the playable teaser they released doesn't leave me optimistic either.

The remake is still happening as it's developed by Alkimia Interactive and published by THQ Nordic, Pyranha Bytes had nothing to do with it.

While it's not a gameplay mod, LORKHAN will freshen up your Skyrim experience all the same. It's a complete soundtrack replacement mod created by the legendary young scrolls himself. It's a stark departure from the original Skyrim's soundtrack while still fitting in perfectly with the game.

Guy is mad that Larian decided to add the pre-order items (literally some cosmetic items that reference their previous game, soundtrack, some art and DnD style character sheets for the Origins) as an optional bundle for people to buy if they missed out and want them. But "day 1 DLC bad" so it doesn't matter how inoffensive this thing is, hate must flow, game shit, 0/10.

Good to know the situation with cross compatibility has improved! I just saw enough posts of people having issues with a shared Windows/Linux NTFS drive over the years to advice against that setup.

Great, good for you. But what's your point? OP explicitly said they have a specific use case for BTRFS and just wanted to know if there are any specific issues related to gaming with it. arch-chroot being slightly different with that filesystem is not an issue for 99% of EndeavourOS users.

Yeah but when is that gonna matter? It uses a graphical installer so you won't need to touch the arch-chroot command at all. And if for some reason you do, the Arch wiki is there for you.

I don't know? It's been a long time since I used Arch, and besides OP is using EndeavourOS so it won't matter.

Unless you're making hundreds of snapshots with massive changes between each it won't matter. It might matter if you plan to use spinning rust as your main drive, but I imagine you'll be using an SSD.