Hugohase

joined 8 months ago
[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 28 points 4 months ago (10 children)

There are just better/faster options...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 10 points 5 months ago

If this is ever deemed feasible the world will already run on renewables. There might have been a time for NPPs but 2024 ain't it.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but they are...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 14 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Love EVs, hate Musk... not sure how to feel :-/

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago

Put as much money into the research of SMRs as you would like to waste. Meanwhile we just build a cheaper, better and more reliable system based on renewables.

This will happen with or without the nukebro hypetrain.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately capacity is the first step, but its a step. I'll crack open a beer when it's consumption or production...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 26 points 6 months ago

I am pretty sure the EU will soon reach the final phase of the electricity transition. Soon it will be more about balancing the grid with storage and upgrading the electricity network and no longer about build out rates of solar and Wind.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)

What a giant waste of resources.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"Enlightened" centrism is not the answer...

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Feline cute?

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

Yes for Sulfur derivates and nitrous oxigens but no for CO2. The biggest contributord to CO2 emissions are electricity production and traffic.

[–] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

I think both. But either way, I am fine.

view more: ‹ prev next ›