this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
35 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

29793 readers
989 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If the descentralization of social networks continue, we will have to prepare for the eventual rise of the instances wars, where people will start to fight about which instance is better and which one is weird to be in and so on, but that's for the future of us all.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pseu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's exactly what's supposed to happen. Instance wars and eventual defederation and fragmentation are important moderation tools, and will progress the culture and feel of instances and regions of the Fediverse. Many instances will form federated [cliques](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique_(graph_theory) that are highly connected and have similar vibes and cultures, and some will be federated with multiple cliques, showing users a variety of cultures and situations.

If the Fediverse reaches a large enough number of people, it can support multiple independant cliques, and enable users see entire mini-universes with different communities and vibes.

[–] oyenyaaow@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

imma have undercover alts everywhere for the sole purpose of getting all the cats communities in one page.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Your legend well be carved into the pages of history as the first person to complete the catalog!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One benefit that people don't talk about enough is it naturally tends towards smaller community sizes than in a centralized system which is a better fit for our tribal human brains.

We're not great with speaking into a room with 1,000 people in it, much less a million.

[–] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

The problem is that it's worse for keeping topics centralized and fragments communities for external reasons. It's antithetical to the idea of a link aggregator where you centralize all of your news if you need to use several of them to make it work. Defederation should be a last resort to protect the admins from legal action, content manipulation, or brigading, not because beehaw thinks open signups harm their safe space. Making the internet a safe space is how we got to this point with Twitter/Google/meta/reddit, and everyone wants to do it all over again to rebuild their echo chambers.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There is nothing better than a good old tribe war.

[–] lemming007@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The biggest problem with lemmy and decentralization right now is that for optimal performance you need to spread out the load relatively evenly between instances. The problem is that users tend to go where other users are (otherwise why go there) and that naturally leads to clumping on one or few instances which causes it to overload.

The way to solve it is to avoid having generic "anything goes" instances and instead have instances be focused on a specific topic. For example, have gaming instance, a personal finance/investing instance, all things home ownership and improvement instance, etc. You can have multiple communities per instance as long as they stay within the same general topic. This way users will naturally spread out by subscribing to different instances based on topics they're interested in. And that will solve the performance issue we're seeing with lemmy.world or other popular instances.

[–] besenwesen@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Were there mailserver wars?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Technically Truth and Gab are activitypub compatible right? We can already fight with them

[–] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I remember the war between /r/me_irl and /r/meirl back in the day on Reddit

Me_irl gang for life personally 😤

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Instance wars" sounds like the way "the consequences of my own actions" will be framed at a point.

The far right instances dripping with hate, bigotry and recycled propaganda will be in an "Instance war" with the mainstream instances talking about regular human being stuff - stuff like beans.

Grab your samurai swords, mall ninjas... and inventory your powdered eggs, theocratic fascist doomsday preppers...

The instance wars are coming for your unvaccinated, homeschooled, incel butts!

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

The important thing here is to get back to social networks and away from social media. The important entities here are the humans, not the memes or the money or the uplems or whatever we eventually call them.

Humans connecting with humans in ways that advance our collective well-being is the promise of social networks that Facebook and Twitter started. Once they saw how many users they had (and the bills for hosting and coding) they got hyper focused on making money.

Hypothetically we can avoid that fate here by having the job of hosting and coding spread out among many. Especially if we also come up with a way to crowd fund the costs of hosting and coding.

[–] EgyptUrnash@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have been running a Mastodon instance since like 2016/17 and this has been quietly happening for the entire time I've been on the fediverse. (I can't check the exact date right now as I'm in the middle of upgrading it.)

Do you want to be in the Anime Girl Who Posts Nazi Memes Fediverse? How about the Queer Furry Fediverse? Or maybe you'd rather be in the Mocking Shitposts Fediverse? Perhaps you want the Everyone Has A Photo Of A Human And Thinks Federating With Facebook's Activitypub Is Actually A Good Idea Fediverse? Or how about the TERF/Gender-Critical Fediverse? Or the "Standalone" Social Site That Is Actually A Fediverse Instance With Federation Disabled And The Credits Removed In Violation Of The Source License?

Some of these Fediverses will happily talk with others. Some of them will rapidly defederate from others as soon as they encounter a place that clearly belongs to a Fediverse they are incompatible with. Some of them quickly get defederated from the Fediverses they are incompatible with. Some of them look at the #fediblock tag, some to keep aware of places worth pre-emptively blocking to make a chill place to talk, some to look for fellow people who have been cast out of someone else's chill zones.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't it already? Lemmygrad, exploding-heads and other extremist instances have already been defederated. But the main feature is the federation itself, which also creates powerful alliances between instances with common values. Platform-wise, it will be just a matter of difference of use and leaning, but federation alliances will work the same

[–] geekosaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't we kinda already have them?

[–] Takina_sOldPairTM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

bombastic side eyes at Beehaw

Interesting to hear this from a dirty lemmy.fmhy.ml-er! 😈

load more comments
view more: next ›