I don't understand what Meta will gain from participating in the fediverse? Their ultimate goal is to make money of Threads and I just don't see how encouraging an open federation will help them do it? Even 3Eing the fediverse will not do them much good as they already have sooo much traffic already that killing the fediverse will not make a serious change in their figures. But OTOH it does seem like Threads is net positive for the fediverse ATM. Even if all current denizens of the fediverse will block Threads, there is a large group of people that are exposed to the concept of "fediverse" for the fist time and some of them will want to learn more. This is a good thing. Anyway, I don't know why they are doing it, but I'm cautiously glad they did it. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.

(page 2) 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Free eyeballs are free eyeballs.

[–] Marxine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meta's biggest business has been the manipulation of public opinion for years now. Their entry in the Fediverse is just their latest attempt at keep doing it. Privacy invasion and targeted ads are just tools that enable it for the former, and finance it for the later.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am sure they want the content we create. And I would bet that their side would have ads for money and profit.

[–] Cyzaine@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

May just be a gamble on future tech. IF federation is the future of the web (and I hope it is!) getting in early and helping shape it makes sense. Its also something of proven tech at the moment, so if they just threw this up fast to take advantage of twitter fires, it makes sense to use something that they know works as opposed to pulling a bluesky and doing it all from scratch. Also means there are more developers out there that are familiar with the tech.

load more comments