this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
108 points (87.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35801 readers
1323 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been re-watching star trek voyager recently, and I've heard when filming, they didn't clear the wide angle of filming equipment, so it's not as simple as just going back to the original film. With the advancement of AI, is it only a matter of time until older programs like this are released with more updated formats?

And if yes, do you think AI could also upgrade to 4K. So theoretically you could change a SD 4:3 program and make it 4k 16:9.

I'd imagine it would be easier for the early episodes of Futurama for example due to it being a cartoon and therefore less detailed.

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't understand why there are so many purists bashing the idea. To answer directly, it can be done and it can be done well enough, albeit you'd need a fair amount of GPU. There's a reason it's mostly used for still images. Also, don't expect scene to scene consistency. New hallways, etc, unless we get models that can account for that.

Also yes, you can upres stuff, even before all this image stuff. It's gotten pretty good, even for video-- usually benefits from some human touch ups though; it's used quite well on some video games. That's easier than out painting, but has trouble with text and finer designs that are harder to guess.

Plus, it's arguably easier with live action rather than animation although I'm not certain. Redoing an art style isn't always easier than just filling in scenes.

Honestly at the rate we're going we could probably even have AI generate whole episodes of stuff, but that's when we're really going to be treading dangerous waters.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It works well enough to be shown for a few seconds at a keynote for static pictures in some cases. It won't yet work well enough to be permanently known as the official "remastered version" for moving video consistently.

Now, someone uploading a watchable version on YouTube? That will happen in the next years if it hasn't already. But that version would be widely ridiculed if released officially because something, somewhere will be off and fans will notice.

[–] snake_case@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that the real beauty of AI? We can go over the parts that fans flag as distracting or obviously wrong, and release a new version. This would have to be done on some streaming service so no physical copies until a finalised version everyone is happy with.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I guess it could be done as a Bandersnatch-style experiment on one streaming platform, but it's so far from the regular way things are done that it seems unlikely.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's the nightmare of AI as far as I'm concerned. Endlessly revising movies and TV away from what was originally created by the filmmakers.

[–] kuneho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Voyager 💛 I'm on last episode of season 6.

I have an old Panasonic plasma and I was always a bit worried when I watch Star Trek (right from TOS) that those black bars on the side of the screen will damage the panel.

But I don't care. It's Star Trek.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›