this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
16 points (76.7% liked)

science

14762 readers
363 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Negative = not blindly believing bullshit from one of the main parties?

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for supporting the article's point

[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I haven't read the article yet, but just going off the title, that makes sense?

If someone is an independent, they're clearly not happy with the way other parties are doing things. And not only are they not happy with them, they're so unhappy that they are deciding to actively run against them. The fact they'd be negative towards the status quo is a logical conclusion. It's like doing a study that finds that sand on a beach is, on average, wetter than sand in a desert.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

toxic positivity/ negative peace aside, I would imagine that not being represented within the established political hegemony could foster some negative emotional response.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

beliefs are religious or political. fun to watch them trip over facts. i'm a negative creep