Selfhosted

46232 readers

256 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

434

Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by otter@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

124 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Synology's telegraphed moves toward a contained ecosystem and seemingly vertical integration are certain to rankle some of its biggest fans, who likely enjoy doing their own system building, shopping, and assembly for the perfect amount of storage. "Pro-sumers," homelab enthusiasts, and those with just a lot of stuff to store at home, or in a small business, previously had a good reason to buy one Synology device every so many years, then stick into them whatever drives they happened to have or acquired at their desired prices. Synology's stated needs for efficient support of drive arrays may be more defensible at the enterprise level, but as it gets closer to the home level, it suggests a different kind of optimization.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Xartle@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

I'm not saying that they won't do this, but so far their actual actions have ended up pretty decent. I've had 3 Synology devices over the last 12(?) years, and while they are not perfect, they have been very good at delivering what they promised over the long haul. All of them still work fine. Even the old guy delivers.

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago

Just lol at Synology trying to do an Nvidia

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is why I chose an ASUS nuc + external bay-storage for my home networking needs, felt like synology NAS would be a limiting factor.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So you built your own NAS, then. NAS is just an acronym, "Network Attached Storage". Not a singular line of products.

That said - I also feel the same way about Synology and the other "all-in-one NAS" brands. Expensive for what they are, which is essentially an incredibly cheap PC with a built in toaster. I built my NAS out of a 2014 Mac Mini (running OMV) and a Sabrent USB-C 4-bay drive dock, and even full of WD Reds, that entire rig is literally half the price of a DS920+. And more powerful.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why would anyone even use Synology?

Just buy a pc with big hard drives

[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

My personal reasons for buying a synology were ease of use, reliability and power usage.

I had previously played around with TrueNAS in a VM using an external USB HDD Enclosure for storage and I just wanted something reliable. With TrueNAS I often ran into issues with user permissions one way or another and the Synology software is incredibly easy to use and foolproof.

[–] Konraddo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Without technical know-how or experience in general using NAS, Synology is a good first-time option. All apps are ready for immediate use. And don't forget the majority of computer users don't even know what a NAS is and they simply want to store files for remote access.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Guess I am going to be taking my "pro-sumer" dollars elsewhere.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Plllbbbbbb @ Synology - I just got one of these and added 2x 4TB ssds this week. I'll eventually add 2x more but for now I'm set: https://www.gmktec.com/products/intel-twin-lake-n150-dual-system-4-bay-nas-mini-pc-nucbox-g9

Fingers crossed that it doesn't blow up or crap out.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments