this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Science

6 readers
10 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago
2
Stevia is considered a "natural non-caloric sweetener." Saccharin and sucralose are considered "non-nutritive sweeteners" (few or no calories). Aspartame is a "nutritive sweetener" (adds some calories (kbin.social)
submitted 1 year ago by mihair@kbin.social to c/science@kbin.social
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Stevia is considered a "natural non-caloric sweetener." Saccharin and sucralose are considered "non-nutritive sweeteners" (few or no calories). Aspartame is a "nutritive sweetener" (adds some calories but far less than sugar).
Aspartame comes with a warning to be used cautiously (or not at all) by people with a rare genetic disease (called phenylketonuria, or PKU) because they have trouble metabolizing it; that's not true for the other sweeteners. And all four vary on their level of sweetness and aftertaste, which is likely why people often prefer one over another.
#Stevia #kombucha #ikombucha_ro #ikombucha
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/sweeteners-time-to-rethink-your-choices-2019022215967

#science

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here