this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
1876 points (99.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7018 readers
2069 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 47 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Correction: pay back a small percentage of what you stole

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

The funny thing is, when I first started working retail, we were encouraged to just say, "Oh, did you forget to complete your purchase?" We weren't allowed to go straight to accusing someone of stealing. That gave them the opportunity to either pay for the items or leave them behind.

[–] Fixxelious@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This whole tipping culture is reaaaallly hard trying to land here northern EU and I absolutely hate it, I refuse to tip anyone. Employers, pay your employees a living wage, it shouldnt be up to customers generosity. You cant? Then sounds like you should charge more of your customers, downsize your business until you can… or go out of business, since sounds like your profitable business is not actually profitable.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What really annoys me is the American servers coming at the patrons: "if you can't afford to tip, you shouldn't eat out!"

I would hate for that attitude to spread to the northern EU as well.

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Cool, bet. Now we don’t eat out and they don’t have jobs.

[–] DogEarBookmark@reddthat.com 6 points 9 hours ago

Stopping this country from eating takeout is more of an undertaking than world peace

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 17 hours ago

Of course there's always the option of begging the government to bail you out, and then they do for some bizarre reason.

We live in a capitalist society for individuals and socialist society for corporations, which feels the wrong way round.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 35 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

NZ parliament recently passed an act clarifying that wage theft is theft and that individuals may be criminally liable if they commit it: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/member/2023/0245/4.0/whole.html

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What's it like, having laws? Are they enforced?

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

We have a lot of nice labour protections (esp compared to the US, yikes) but ofc this means business goes around them (and current parties are discussing rolling them back to 'support small businesses' from having to do that).

It's really hard to fire a worker under contract unless they straight up abandon their job or violate their contract. If youre bad at your job, but not dangerous, its so hard to fire you (and taking you off shifts, ie: constructive dismissal, is also prohibited) that you'll basically be sticking around anyway.

But that means that employers just hire part-timers to work juuuuust under the requirements, or have them on the 90-day probationary period and oop sorry, I don't think it's a great fit. The results is that job stability is pretty good if you can actually fucking get one, but most younger Kiwis are stuck in casual work or move overseas.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

and current parties are discussing rolling them back to 'support small businesses' from having to do that

Having not looked into the current parliament (I'm from Australia), let me guess, the conservatives?

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

More of less, though the division of 'liberal vs conservative', where almost all political and lifestyle ideals boil down into two camps (and leftists made invisible) is a very American one. I know that Aus is more 'conservative' than NZ is too, though surely not as much as the US.

Its more accurate to say its the neo-liberals. After Reagan and his Reaganomics, our cabinet followed through with our version, Rogernomics: selling off public services and resources to private for-profit holders.

To this day, Rogernomics and free-market liberalism (with focus on bonuses for hunting, fishing, and landlords) is the message of the National and ACT parties that are frequently in coalition.

You could call National conservative I suppose, but they're centre-right and have more in common with US Democrats. Our hard-right party is NZ First (the nationalism is in the name), and the seats for NACT where so weak that they have a coalition with them this cycle.

Together, 'NACT1' is doing a lot of shit, but ofc the Prime Minister, National's party leader, pushes the bills through 'under urgency' and then blames the leaders of the other parties for even proposing it, like his hands are clean.

And the other leaders - especially Winston - are proposing insane bills. Like, preventing illegal Mexican immigrants? In New Zealand? it's an obvious ploy for Kiwis that eat American propaganda on Facebook, but it will work. Our public news has also started using terms like 'wokeism' and 'DEI'. [siiiigh]

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Thanks for the summary! I'm not using conservative in the US sense (which yeah, doesn't really have left-wing parties with any power), but more as a catch all for parties in the anglosphere such as: Australia: Liberal/National, UK: The Tories and I suppose for NZ: the Nationals and ACT.

They're practically aligned on most policies whenever I hear about each.

Just thought: there's no way a left-leaning party would think of rolling back something as obvious as making wage theft a crime.

And I'm not surprised I guessed right haha

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

You've adopted the American nightmare known as gig culture. So sorry, but it seems all we export now is dystopian bullshit. And bombs, obv.

[–] Eddbopkins@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Doordash corporation is nothing but a theiving evil company run by thriving evil immoral scumbags.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We have a legal system that protects the rich and punishes the poor. Luigi gave us a taste of what the opposite could look like.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should I DM the mod of this community and double check if it's okay for me to upvote? Oh silly me... this is lemmy. Of course it's okay to upvote this fact of life!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm assuming this is a reference to something that I'm going to say Reddit has done?

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

Reddit started sending out warning messages to people who upvote posts with the word "Luigi" in it and I believe you can now get full on banned for upvoting too many posts that say "Luigi".

[–] zell565@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

"Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility" Ambrose Bierce

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 190 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Wage theft is bigger than all other theft, but far fewer people are dragged onto the sidewalk and strangled to death for it. Maybe that should change.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Few things.

  1. Corporations are not people. Laws need to change and loopholes need to be closed.
  2. The rich need to pay their way. Laws need to change and loopholes need to be closed.
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I wonder if you could create an argument for this blatant disparity and how punishments are meted out to show how penalties for shoplifting and personal theft crimes are cruel and unusual. If stealing 17 million comes with less penalty than stealing 1700 then the penalties for 1700 are therefore unusual right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise

load more comments
view more: next ›