this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1400 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
4944 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 107 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

if ads were normal and unobtrusive. We wouldn't need ad blockers. Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate. I had been running an ad blocker for so many years that when a friend (who doesn't use an ad blocker) showed me a website, the unfiltered experience was horrifying.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate.

Its even worse than just hurting usability. Lots of ad networks are not policing their advertising customers and malicious payloads have been injected from ads. So allowing ads is a security risk because of the lack of security at the various ad networks.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 hours ago

It's even worse when you consider the entire point of advertising is to deliver a targeted payload at a very specific demographic. So you can target IT folks of a specific company, etc.

[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 54 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

I love this movie but honestly it's getting to the point where I can't even watch it without getting upset.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 34 points 15 hours ago

uBO is not just an ad blocker, its almost a firewall against malware and a tracking filter

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I was about to comment something similar but you said it before I did. Sometimes I'll mistakenly open YouTube with Chrome and then I realize I messed up because I have to sit through three, sometimes one-minute long ads just to watch a twenty second video. I'll typically just nope out and switch to Firefox. The worst thing is they're unskippable and I swear for some of them the ad actually pauses if you switch to another tab or browser. I'm getting ads even on super old videos so I'm pretty sure it isn't all to do with the channels themselves monetizing their videos.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

3 one minute long adds are better than those 2 hour long prageru racist propaganda videos trying to masquerade as "Educational" content

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Im old enough to remember the internet before ads, and with ads became a thing and you had to make sure to keep your speakers low/off all the time less some screaming loud ad popped up somewhere to burst your eardrums at 2am.

There were so many obnoxious, visual cancer ads.

Then they became actual digital cancer by being injection points for viruses and malware, and thus adblockers became a necessity.

And they remain a necessity to this day, for the same reason as they were 20+ years ago.

and yet the ad servers want to blame the end user for adblocking.

not their absolute refusal to moderate or police any of the content they deliver.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 hours ago

I went to help out a friend, a few years ago, he runs vanilla Edge, I can't believe anyone actually uses the internet like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 65 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 37 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

And if you don't like Firefox, use one of the Firefox forks. Some of them are very Chrome-like.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 30 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone should ditch chrome

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 11 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

My fucking organization refuses to support anything but Chrome. I hate it so much.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 70 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Chrome is no longer available on my computer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

And that is why I went to Firefox once Google announced this bullshit.

Swapping is pretty painless. It even brings over all your passwords and stuff these days. Best get to swapping before Google disable that as well. They'd just love to keep you hostage.

[–] samTheSwiss@lemm.ee 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Use a third party password manager, don’t rely on browser default ones

[–] zeropublix@lemmy.ml 11 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Some suggestions:

  • Bitwarden (US based but with EU hosting, free tier, open source)
  • proton-pass (Swiss based with free tier)
  • Keepass (open source system, free “self-hosted” through cloud saves)
  • 1pass (Us based, paid tiers only)
  • Lastpass (US based, free tier. Lots of breaches in the past so I can’t recommend)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 53 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I take this as a sign that it genuinely still works to block ads and hasn’t sold out and become malware like those others that used to be popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh

Doesn't cover 100% of what uBO did, but it still works just as good IMO with DNS based ad-blocking on top.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Surprised so few people are aware of this. It seems equivalent to me when you give it the same permissions Ublock Origin had.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Agreed. I haven't even found anything that it doesn't block that UbOrigin did.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SirFasy@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not surprising, Google is an ad company at this point.

[–] alligalli@feddit.org 13 points 14 hours ago

It never was anything else

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 12 points 16 hours ago
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 253 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›