this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
939 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5217 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The real benchmark is: the world growing at 10 percent," he added. "Suddenly productivity goes up and the economy is growing at a faster rate. When that happens, we'll be fine as an industry."

Needless to say, we haven't seen anything like that yet. OpenAI's top AI agent — the tech that people like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman say is poised to upend the economy — still moves at a snail's pace and requires constant supervision.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI is burning a shit ton of energy and researchers’ time though!

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s not the worst. It is burning billions for the companies with no signs of them ever becoming close to profitable.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You say this like it’s a bad thing?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That’s standard for emerging technologies. They tend to be loss leaders for quite a long period in the early years.

It’s really weird that so many people gravitate to anything even remotely critical of AI, regardless of context or even accuracy. I don’t really understand the aggressive need for so many people to see it fail.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I just can't see AI tools like ChatGPT ever being profitable. It's a neat little thing that has flaws but generally works well, but I'm just putzing around in the free version. There's no dollar amount that could be ascribed to the service that it provides that I would be willing to pay, and I think OpenAI has their sights set way too high with the talk of $200/month subscriptions for their top of the line product.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't call that a "summary", but interesting read all the same. Thanks for the link.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Makes sense that the company that just announced their qbit advancement would be disparaging the only "advanced" thing other companies have shown in the last 5 years.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Joseph Weizenbaum: "No shit? For realsies?"

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›