this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
152 points (83.9% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

El Pais paywall can be disabled via reader view in your web browser.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

Most men are not much into the idea, either.

Intimacy is something very human, something most people are not ready to trust a machine to do, even if it's capable of visibly empathetic reactions.

There is a desire to connect with another human being, not programmed to like you, but actually choosing you freely. It's what people call "feeling it real".

Most folks I have seen pushing for robotic partners are incels craving at least some form of closeness - having something like this might be better than nothing.

Also, dudes, let's be real: would you put your dick into a machine much stronger than you? Something goes wrong and you don't have your precious parts anymore.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 19 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I dunno, everyone was cool with the love story of Wanda & The Vision from the MCU. I guess fucking robots is not ok, but becoming emotionally attached to one is?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago)

The love story in the movie "Her" is even more impressive. It's impressive because it's not even a robot, it's just an AI voice and yet the love story is still compelling. And it also asks bigger questions, sure there's the question of could a person fall in love with a machine, and is that ok? But it goes further to ask, if the machine is actually intelligent, what does the machine see in the humans? Do the machines actually still need the humans at all?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think that's a linear logic. We all know Vision is a robot. But we also know it's a story about a robot that is played by a man. We are watching for the spectacle, not because we believed the story to be real.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Vision was also a robot with human-type consciousness and intelligence. We can, at least, nudge that into "funny-looking human" through suspension of disbelief.

Our level of robots is nowhere near that.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I will get a sex robot when it can scoop catboxes and fold laundry.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago

Genius! It will sell even without the sex

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are plenty of women who don't have intercourse regularly, but they are less likely than their male counterparts to whine about it.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 0 points 56 minutes ago

They are less likely to be much concerned, even.

Men, on average, have a stronger sexual drive.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 43 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically how is a man going to design a good sex robot for a woman? Let a woman do that, they'll get what they want.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Women already have the perfect sex bot. It's called a Sybian.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (11 children)

And if that Sybian could pick you up, and stroke your thighs, massage your breasts, have hips and legs to simulate the sexual positions that it can't provide you, while still being what it is, there is a huge room for improvement on the design of the sybian and what great things it does

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

✅: Does what it's asked to do

✅: Doesn't talk back

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago

You're telling me women don't like vibrators.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago

Speak for yourself. Gimme that drama free dick.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 251 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

I guess a vibrator isn't a type of sex robot?

Just saying that these sort of toys were way more normalized for women long before they were for men.

A man with a fleshlight was a gross weirdo, a woman with a vibrator is a strong independent woman taking control of her sexuality and not settling for the weakness of flesh in men.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 11 points 16 hours ago

This was my thought. Its the same way all our technology has grown. Honestly I think brain interfaces could eclipse robots like this before they are that great. As scary as that is.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] OmnislashIsACloudApp@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

every time I see crap like this it make me think about that 30rock porn for women skit with Tina Fey

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no expert on attraction, but what if the sex robot looked like a skeleton?

[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I want to get off Mr. Bones Wild Ride.

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I want to get off on Mr. Bones Wilde Ride.

[–] towelie@lemm.ee 69 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Sex with a hella sexy robot? Nice.

Using a hella sexy robot to fill the emptiness of no intimacy or authentic mutual connection? Not nice.

For some reason sex with a robot doesn't feel gross to me — until they start using it to fill a hole (hehe)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

What about for people who struggle to have emotional intimacy and sexual intimacy throughout their lives because of medical issues or mental health issues?

My ex has a brother who is now pushing 40 and has never even held a woman's hand. He has severe mental disabilities and will never live life on his own without some kind of caretaker. We know he looked at porn, partially because he refused to ever let people fix up his computer, usually out of fear of people seeing his porn.

Does he not deserve emotional and sexual intimacy? There is a high likelihood he will never have it otherwise.

until they start using it to fill a hole

What about, like in the situation I just described, when that hole will otherwise go a lifetime of being unfulfilled? Is that fair to them for being born a way they didn't choose?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›