this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
1091 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

10348 readers
1611 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] odelik@lemmy.today 32 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If you just repurpose for housing you just wind up with 40,000 people needing transit and overloading the system you're trying to promote.

We need to think beyond housing and towards having communities that largely provide the needs of the people living with them. Shops, offices, other non-office/shop jobs, and recreational activities need to be considered as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 32 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

BuT wHeRe WouLd i PaRk mY cAr?!?!!?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 19 hours ago

In the water hazard on the 14th hole.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 19 hours ago

Plus you can live in a pentagon! Just not the Pentagon.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 22 hours ago

When there's no more golf you'll know the rich fucks are gone.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Most suburban streets are 50 feet wide, many suburban front yards are 50 feet deep. That's a wasted space 150 feet wide and however long the street is long. Think of how much housing could be built in that space if you tore up that road, and in its place put a pair of alleyways housing in the middle

[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I would argue closer to 30, unless you’re including all the easement and sidewalks?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] admin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Good luck with the NIMBYs. Or NIMFYs now I guess?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not for nothing, but this wouldn't fly in the USA. You'd need to replace most of those trees with roads.

Or better yet, reduce the number of housing units and keep the trees.

[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 5 points 21 hours ago

This is Seattle btw, but I think the meme is that it won't fly.

[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Keeping all of the trees while also building a 40,000 unit apartment building on the same lot is gonna be a bit of a trick. Unless the building is 30 stories high. That might be normal in New York, but that’s not something you’re gonna see very much outside of the city.

I’m all for vertical city building, but keep in mind what is likely to happen in your local community.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure you've misunderstood the idea here in a couple of ways

[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

No, I get it. I was just trying to make a joke.

Apparently, it wasn’t very funny.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What if we just altered zoning laws so they don't restrict high-density residential buildings?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Oh, they didn't change that, people living there need to get real good at dodging golf balls.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 21 hours ago

But where would we play golf?

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago
[–] don@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago

Yeah but then rich fucks wouldn’t have a place all to themselves to be rich fucks, so that’s a fuck you, poors, just be rich like us, thanks.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I guess that technically counts as a public sex forest then

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›