this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
192 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Picasso@thelemmy.club 10 points 18 hours ago
[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More like bye-bit, am I right??

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

Angry upvote you horrible genius.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

The money is not gone, is just that someone else has it.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm so glad I have no crypto of any kind. It's the wild west with no savings insurance, so once it's gone, it's gone.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends which exchange you're using.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Anybody who keeps their money on an exchange any longer than necessary is just asking for trouble. An exchange is like a public toilet. You get in, you shit, and you get the fuck out. You don't hang around in a public toilet.

Self custody or GTFO.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's not what the question was about.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There was no question. There was a statement.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 1 hour ago

Alright, that's not what the statement was about.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (7 children)

How does one get ones hands on a cold wallet?

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My speculations:

  • "insecure from the start" - as in , the wallet was never that "cold"

  • with that amount of money, it's easy to imagine an "insider threat"

  • the hackers could have gotten lucky and struck right when the company was doing legitimate operations on the wallet

  • but probably it's a towering mountain of incompetence, composed of the elements above and more

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago

Right next to their iq

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a common misconception that a "cold wallet" is offline. It's still on the blockchain like any other wallet, it's just the keys that aren't on any network-connected computer.

It appears that in this case hackers managed to trick Bybit employees into entering the keys into a fake UI that gave the hackers access to them.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

That’s room temperature wallet. It was used while claiming asset unused.

It is not cold storage anymore.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Tricked or “tricked”.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do I understand this correctly, then, that this was some sort of MITM attack where valid requests to the multisig parties were replaced by malicious code while still appearing to be valid to the signers? That must be an inside job.

And this is the first time I have heard the word "musked" in this context.....

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Do I understand this correctly, then, that this was some sort of MITM attack where valid requests to the multisig parties were replaced by malicious code while still appearing to be valid to the signers? That must be an inside job.

I have no idea. I guess they'll release a lot more info regarding this in the next few days.

And this is the first time I have heard the word “musked” in this context…

I think his English isn't good looking at the rest of the message. Might be "masked" instead.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

What I don't quite understand is how there is 1.5 billion in a single wallet. Or how are these things structured?

This article puts their total assets under management at $15.7b, which are held in different cryptocurrencies with ethereum at just above $5b.

So I am wondering how they have more than 1/6 of their Ethereum in a single wallet or were these multiple that were connected and got compromised through the same vulnerability? How expensive is it to have more individual wallets? Would it not be feasible to have it split in something like $100m chunks? Or any other more moderate size.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I recommend gloves.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well, either it wasn't as offline as they all thought, or someone pulled off an epic inside job.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

With steely determination

[–] nick@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 0 points 21 hours ago

I gotta get in on this hacking gig. Anyone know if any hacker groups are hiring?

/s for CSIS

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago