this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
326 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

60566 readers
3503 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the British civil service, even operating under previous administrations, can put together a multi-functioning government domain that runs reasonably well without JavaScript, there's no reason Google can't continue to do the same with a ducking web search.

The former works better with JavaScript, that's true, but it works OK without and that's the point.

Then again, the civil service were ordered to do it largely out of spite because the government didn't want to give the plebs any excuse for not being able to use the site.

I'm not sure how to get Google to lose the need for scripting in the same way.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I think this isn't a case of if Google can, but rather of why they should. Do enough people really use the modern web without JavaScript to justify spending the resources to test and maintain functionality without JS? And they probably don't want to let the few people that don't have JS to open support tickets or write articles about how google.com is broken. Easier to just block it on purpose than to let it decay.

It makes more sense that a government website would support it, since they can't let even a single person fall through the cracks, and changing laws/regulations is more difficult than making a company decision.

Me, to Google right now:

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only I could replace YouTube...

Being a parasite is the Google business model

[–] tkr@jlai.lu 3 points 1 day ago

yt-dlp direct to > peertube. Never google/yt again, i would prefer books instead cooperate with them

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 6 points 1 day ago

Not like I was using it to search anyway

[–] Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 day ago

If I have to go back to using Excite, I will.

Like, I'm tired of Google Search, it's always been shit. I'm tired of it's AI Generalization, tired of it's garbage results, tired of the stupid section of questions asked by 'people' with these low-hanging fruit and softball but dumb questions there is to be asked.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Curious if this going to affect google results in Searx. Not sure how it works (scraping page, API, etc)

[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why I am a happy Kagi user.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Somehow I doubt the bloated AI search engine works without JS.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›