this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
264 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

60566 readers
3559 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

I know lots of people are mad, but I just see TikTok as another centralized platform that capitulates to special interests (read: money). I think the ban is a net positive, and I wouldn't lose any sleep if they banned other centralized social media platforms.

It never feels good to have the rug pulled out from under you, but people will find better ways to communicate. Humans are nothing if not creative problem solvers.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Anyone know if it's possible to take a program and "decompile" it? Like reverse engineering or something so it could be verified to be "clean?"

I imagine with all the resources the government has they could achieve such a thing if they were really concerned about national security and not really just worried about metas profits.

I mean what would Elon buying it have really changed about the actual code of the apps? It would just change who gets the profits, no?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Unanimous?! Makes you wonder what they know that we might not.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Imagine believing these wacky old farts know anything at all about the internet.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Most of them[1] know a whole lot more about constitutional law than the average lemming.

When things are working correctly, the Supreme Court's role is usually not very concerned with the facts of the case; its role is to resolve questions of law. Congress considered the facts including some classified briefings, decided that American app stores should be forbidden from distributing TikTok to American users, and made a law. The court was asked whether Congress has the authority to make laws like that, and the court decided that it does.

[1] Maybe not Clarence Thomas

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Then they should be fired. The Constitution, in plain English, bans the practice of naming a person or group in a law specifically to punish them. That's the domain of courts. These judges are either illiterate or corrupt.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Nothing. The arguments were public. They obliterated the first amendment rights of 170 million Americans because the government said National Security. If the government can use magic words to make your rights disappear, then you don't have those rights.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›