this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
792 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60566 readers
3895 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Are they still allowed on Lemmy?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All of a sudden their test scores start going through the roof.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I hear they're not allowed to watch porn until 18 either and that works flawlessly.

Beyond questions of implementation this to me sounds like maybe we're replacing Instagram with Fortnite, but it sure will be interesting to see how it plays out. I guess trying something is better than trying nothing.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

this isn't for the safety of kids; it's to eliminate the ability for queer kids to find a community.

[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Are you Australian? That just feels like kind of a US centric lens to analyze this through, though you're right that loss of community is a byproduct.

Like, I'm not exactly happy with the Albanese government, but I would say that most negative LGBTQ things they have said or done have been cowardly attempts to avoid drama from the Liberals, not active bigotry

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What community? This is social media we're talking about. Have people really convinced themselves that these things are communities?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I am so, so glad to see that at least one country in the world is willing to tackle this problem.

Also a little depressed that every comment thread about this law boils down to: "It's hard. Might as well not do it at all," especially from people who (rightly) think we need to ban guns every time a school gets shot up here in the US, which would be monumentally difficult socially but 100% needs to happen.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

especially from people who (rightly) think we need to ban guns

Oh no, it's stupid....

Yeah I don't really understand the pile on.

Enforcement is not important in any way. If most kids are on social presently, then by making it illegal it just won't be a place for kids to congregate any more. What would be the point of lying about your age to create a facebook account if none of your friends are there.

Sure, some kids will still be on social, perhaps most kids will be, but there's no doubt in my mind that their usage will diminish dramatically. That's how public health works.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 week ago

Should be left up to the parents.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›