this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
105 points (94.9% liked)

Linux

48333 readers
630 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Linus' thread: (CW: bigotry and racism in the comments) https://social.kernel.org/notice/AWSXomDbvdxKgOxVAm (you need to scroll down, i can't seem to link to the comment in the screenshot)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eighty@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can relate to the "how the fuck is being a concerned human being extreme/poltical?" energy in the post hard.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Hate is mainstream politics now, sadly. So yes, not hating is political as well.

[–] paaviloinen@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

That's what "being political" means. Otherwise you'd be apathetic, cynical and not concerned about anything.

[–] flibbertigibbet@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Political? For everyone outside of America that's just common sense.

[–] LlamaSutra@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In Canada it’s starting to become “political” since our morons are egged on by the morons down south.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xyon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Hello I'm a trans person from the UK here to tell you this is sadly not the case at all.

[–] caribou@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Politics used to be something people engaged in. Now politics is the core to a lot of people's identities, which means disagreement or debate is perceived as a personal attack and people will embrace a tremendous amount of cognitive dissonance to avoid being wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Linus gives exactly zero fucks about saying exactly what's on his mind. And it's almost always massively based. He's always been great about that, we don't deserve such a great mind.

[–] CrownCrafter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Remember the time with the anti vaxxer, man was firing with all cylinders

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RenaHersch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy shit a based Linus is not what I expected to see today. Makes me prefer Linux even more than I already did.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would you use for a synonym for based? I keep seeing that used. I always thought it was just some alt-right meme bullshit, but I'm learning I was wrong. I still don't get the use. My mind always thinks "based on what?"

[–] ott@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Based" is typically used to describe someone who says/does something without caring if they'll be judged for it. Most commonly, it's shorthand for "That's a controversial opinion and you are bold for saying it, but I agree with you." It turns the previous sentence into an adjective, which is a little weird but it makes sense eventually.

So if I had to choose a single word as a synonym, I would say "Bold".

Bold, all right, yes. That works for me. It's really been hurting my head reading "based" and not being able to make sense of it. Thank you! Seriously.

[–] xenago@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Linus has always been political and principled, I mean he chose the GPL for a reason! Glad to see him state all of this outright though, it only makes me respect him more.

[–] raccoon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hard fisagree. Linux isn't political. Everyone has an opinion, it's obvious Linus would too. But I am pretty happy that his opinion is one I personally agree with. Linux can be uaed by anyone though, and nothing stops far right activists (terrorists) from making a distro, which would still be Linux. There's a heavily religious distro too, but that doesn't make Linux as a whole religious.

[–] raresbears@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does that really make it totally apolitical though?. Like obviously it's not inherently attached to a wide reaching political ideology, but it still is political in the same way that any free software is kind of political.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thatonedude1210@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

This is one of the reasons why I respect him so much.

[–] Themightypooper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

After being disappointed by Steve, Linus lifted my spirits.

[–] Plasma@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FOSS is an active political statement!

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Was just coming here to say that. The entire Ethos of Open Source is basically the people owning the digital means of production. So some people really not grasp that?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This fact eludes some folks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] seahorse@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I half agree with his gun regulation stance. While ideally there would be more caution given to who owns guns that is unfortunately not the world americans have been living in the last 80 years or so. The fascists have guns, lots of them, and I'm not giving mine up while they have them.

Everything else he said is 100% based.

[–] Metallinatus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, fascists having guns is a "randomly giving guns to any moron with a pulse" problem.

[–] Andreas@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago

When you're in power, the fascists are the "morons with a pulse" who don't get guns, but when they're in power, YOU'RE the moron with a pulse who loses your ability to defend yourself. The point is to remove the ability of the authorities to decide who gets the right to own weapons, because it can easily be turned against you. Besides, morons obtain weapons illegally all the time. Firearms ownership is illegal in my country (except for licensed use like hunting) but we still have problems with gun violence because of weapons trafficking.

[–] workinkindofhard@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I do think it is funny that there is significant overlap between the ACAB crowd and those that would want to disarm (or at least heavily restrict) the average Joe so only police have access to modern firearms

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Devgard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

lol i read gun regulation as pro-gun.

glad to be proven wrong :)

[–] roda@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Woman right to choose, fair enough. Regulated guns, absolutely. The less guns the better. Gay people stuff, I couldn't care less. Check.

The man said it as it should be said.

[–] lemme@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Did you know that linux kernel source code was leaked to the public? Go see for yourself how political it is!

/s

[–] eoli3n@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

social.kernel.org : one should migrate to lemmy :°

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Puls3@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

One great thing about about software is you don't have to agree with or care about what the creators thoughts and beliefs are, software is at the end of the day just software.

Doesn't get any less political than that.

[–] ravermeister@lemmy.rimkus.it 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I create software by myself and disagree. First it's very political where and for whom I choose to develop software. Second, software is always made for a purpose and the purpose can be indeed (and is) very often linked to political or social cause. E.g. a software which only purpose is to harm people, say for controlling mass destruction weapons is in my point of view a very political software

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Metallinatus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Holy fuck, I love that guy even more now. I didn't know that was possible.

[–] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

comrade linus 🫡🫡

but also he’s finnish, which is communist, so he’s obviously a communist smh 🤷‍♀️

[–] subca@opensocial.at 1 points 1 year ago

@juergen @k_o_t A paranoic fascist here.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linus is stellar example of "good is not nice."

He will rake you over the coals because he cares about quality and expects better from everyone.

[–] guyman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Good can be nice. This is just him personally and shouldn't be seen as a guideline on how to be good.

[–] maddison@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

average based Linus take.

[–] bobslaede@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I don't see how his, very reasonable, views makes Linux itself (more?) political. What is the point of this post?

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The man can say what he wants and it's nothing to do with Linux. And, his gun stance seems fair to me. I think he is an intelligent man, and I think he's allowed to say his thoughts without some lame arse trying to tie his ideals to the OS. Move on, nothing to see here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›