this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
99 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39367 readers
2382 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] underthesign@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone here thinking the reason they were dropped was because the quality turned to shit after the buyout, but the main reason is their continued presence operating in Russia after their thankfully failed attempt to annex Ukraine. I'm pleased the royals took a stand. Ultimately both are good reasons to drop them.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

Everyone here thinking the reason they were dropped was because the quality turned to shit

But how else am I supposed to show my really cool and deep personality of hating anything vaguely popular?

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's shit chocolate now, I can fully understand it.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Kraft is the death of quality.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Whenever I hear Kraft I instantly think of a block of cooking fat. With Cadbury it's the same block of fat but brown.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 89 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This shouldn't come as a surprise. Since its takeover by Kraft/Mondelez their chocolate has become poorer quality. As soon as the Cadbury name was being licenced to various other diversified food products (ice cream, cakes etc.) it was a sign of what was to come. Sad. Still not as bad as Hershey's though.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

I use the same metric for videogames. The instant they're buying up other companies' IP to sell skins, they're cooked.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 30 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Can someone explain to me what is this warrant list? What does it bring to companies in it?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 31 points 18 hours ago

It's like "the official chocolate company of the Philadelphia Eagles".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_warrant_of_appointment_(United_Kingdom)

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 30 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The warrant enables the supplier to advertise that they supply to the royal family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_royal_warrant_holders_of_the_British_royal_family

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Gotcha so nothing burger then.

There is absolutely no reason why anyone in the world should give a shit about some irrelevant family.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Like it or not (personally I don't) lots of brits care about them. And a surprising amount of non brits too

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 13 minutes ago

Sure but it’s an extreme minority. This is like caring what the kardashians are doing.

[–] codapine@lemm.ee 10 points 5 hours ago

No, but it implies that the brand has attained a certain level of quality to the point where some rich pleb sponges have decided they rather like it. The papers want to know who's shirts you wear...

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 36 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Surprised it didn't happen sooner. Americans don't do chocolate well. They should stick to going to the moon.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Here's a little explanation as to the differences with US chocolate.

The bit about Butyric Acid explains why US chocolate tastes literally like vomit; it's the component in vomit that gives it the distinctive taste and smell.

When Hershey's products came to the UK they initially had to be relabelled to reflect the extremely low cocoa content and be called "chocolate flavored candy bar".

Ironically, the article references Cadbury.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 31 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hey! Do you Europeans not appreciate corn in your chocolate or something?!

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You put a bit of corn in their bread and they legally declare it cake. Can’t win with them

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Huh? Are you trying to take a swing at corn bread cuz homie, every southern matriarch would like a word. Don't shit on corn bread lol. But for real what is the connection between corn, chocolate and cake. I'll be the first to admit candy corn is candy from Satan's anus. The closest I can gather is carrot cake and that shit is just as good as corn bread if not better.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

i’d say it’s because when you put HFCS in bread in a lot of countries it categorises the thing as cake as far as regulations are concerned

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not being snarky, I swear. But Cadbury eggs were/are super gross. Were those made in America for Americans and you get a different product?

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Never saw the hype behind those.

I'll be real though: chocolate is expensive as fuck and not worth the money.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Creme eggs have been around for 60-odd years. They're crazy sweet and not very high-quality – especially after the Kraft acquisition, as it's not even Cadbury's Dairy Milk any more.

What you get in the US are smaller and made over there by Hershey, so frankly they're probably as bad or worse, but you're not missing out on much.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Huh? Some of the best chocolate is Ghirardelli which is American.

Maybe you just don’t understand American chocolate.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's a Swiss-owned company originally founded by an Italian in... barely the US. Two years after California joined the union.

A kilo for forty bucks. Are you kidding me. That's way too cheap to be good cocoa, actually good chocolate costs 150-200 per kg.

milk fat, vanilla extract, natural flavor, soy lecithin.

...it gets worse and worse. You want to see none of those in good chocolate. But at least Lindt checks out as an owner they upcharge you for the gold paint on the packaging and also use cheap cocoa.

Go to Aldi. Buy Moser-Roth. Same quality, priced sensibly. Or treat yourself and buy something from Domori.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 16 points 22 hours ago

Why does anyone give a shit about a parasite's tier list? Charlie don't like Cadbury? Meh.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 1 points 21 hours ago

Oooooookay then.