this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
59 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60035 readers
3913 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago

I used to do some work with Qualcomm and ARM IP. They both need to die. ARM is holding back all manner of technologies with their absolutely insane and byzantine licensing scheme and Qualcomm is one of the most evil tech companies in existence, you just don't hear about them because their particular evil is constrained to B2B interactions.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

She won’t load for me. TLDR?

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 24 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Qualcomm bought nuvia, which had a broad license to use ARM's IP. They used said IP to make chips.

ARM claims that the change in ownership somehow invalidates the license and they were required to renegotiate new terms.

They couldn't convince a jury because that doesn't make sense without very specific terms explicitly detailing exactly what conditions nullify their license agreement.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t know why a blanket, terms not transferable upon sale, wouldn’t have covered it, but either that is too broad or didn’t exist in the original Nuvia contract.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Companies get acquired all the time. Losing licenses is not the norm.

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

It's not about losing a license. ARM's angle was that Nuvia's license was for the server market. Qualcomm had their own license for the mobile chips. ARM's issue was that the chip was developed under one license and sold/manufactured under another. (At least the first version)

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree but that doesn’t really have anything to do with what’s in the Nuvia contract. I assume you mean it wouldn’t be the norm to have not transferrable in there.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, the terms would probably be legal, but they'd be so prohibitive that most companies wouldn't sign them. Having to get a new license to key technology negotiated when you want to sell is a huge handicap.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's a bullshit argument, practically it's the same as if Nuvia sold their license to Qualcomm, which they obviously wouldn't have the right to do.
I don't see how Arm lost this suit, they did NOT grant that license to Qualcomm. The judgement seems ridiculous.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's not the same.

Companies being acquired for their contracts is a daily occurrence.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between an order contract an a license.
The license to make Arm CPU was granted to Nuvia not to Qualcomm.

Qualcomm using the license, is the same as transferring or selling it, and that's NOT normal with a patent or copyright license. Except if it is kept within the intended scope.

Qualcomm taking over the license changes the scope, and that would usually be clearly enough to invalidate it.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No, there is not. A license is just a contract.

Buying a company because they have a license you want is not remotely unusual. It's perfectly standard behavior, and the entire enterprise world would fall apart if an acquisition lost the rights to licenses the purchased business owned.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Ok, thanks! Yeah I’m from everything I heard it seems that ARM is just whining.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 23 hours ago

She won’t load for me. TLDR?

This is bonkers