this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
54 points (92.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44143 readers
1040 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I ask because I feel I need to save some money in the oncoming months. Currently, I pay over $76 for 100MBps/1000GB cap. And I don't think it's a bad deal, but they're going to be hiking it up to $90+ by next October and I feel it is not worth that. But I also need to save money too.

What is the difference between 55MB and 100MB when it comes to speed? The cap for the 55MBps plan is 350GB and I tried asking if that could be altered but the ISP says they can't. This plan will cost me $30 a month.

All I ever do anymore is just stream YouTube, sometimes Hulu/Netflix/Tubi. Occasionally I'll download a game or two, multiplayer gaming is non-existent.

Edit: There's been a lot of good responses replied to this and I appreciate it.

I'm leaning towards on downgrading with the volume of people that suggest that it isn't that bad, but it boils down to preferences and habitual behaviors when using the internet. With so many games already downloaded and being left to just streaming/Second Life, I think it warrants the change.

I just wish that my ISP would've kicked up the cap to 500GB because that'd sweeten the deal much more but this ISP is not well known and these kind of ISPs operate on different worlds than the big names.

Furthermore, people have suggested going 5G Wireless but the problem with that is that my apartment management is stingy as fuck so it's not an option for me nor does Verizon say that they can offer a plan in my current location. Fiber connections such as Google Fiber, MetroNet .etc aren't an option.

Century Link seems to only offer $70 for...10MB in my location (Fucking awful)

Mediacom says they can't even service my area (then how come I see your vans around where I am with other customers?)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Speed should be the same (as in ping), the bandwidth is half of it. If you are alone 50Mb/s should be more than enought for people who don't need to download huge amounts of data quickly.

So if you don't build operating systems from source code, don't need to download huge games on a regular basis, don't work as a editor with huge video files you share with others, don't do p2p pirating, and similar things, I don't think you will see a big difference.

If you're a big family where everyone starts streaming youtube or twitch/netflix or do alot of voice/IP calls when they come home at the same time, then you will feel the difference.

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

You have data caps in the US???? I pay 40 euros a month for a 2Gb/s connection in France with no data cap.

[–] FeloniousPunk@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

$106 for 1.2G cable in Oregon, US - when it works. Praying for the day we get fiber in our neighborhood - it was infinitely better. They DO list a data cap but never enforce it. I think if they did, the town would burn down the office.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

40 euros! Paying just 30€ for 10Gb/s in Portugal..

[–] N00b22@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

80$ for 200Mbps fiber here in Costa Rica

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

laughs in 25Mbps for $60 in Australia

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago

I'm betting $100 on you running back to your ISP's nearest office to extend your plan within a week.

[–] AstroLightz@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You guys get more than 1MB/s?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

You guys get less than a gigabit?

[–] essell@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought I was overpaying for my 1500Mbps at £75

Thank you EU for your many blessings.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

EU ? £ ? Didn’t you guys leave ?

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

lol now comes australia: $109 for 100/40, and that’s a good deal because our conservative government fucked everything and pissed away $40bn

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Last summer I switched to Tmo 5G home internet. At my location it beats the 100/20 cable plan I had at half the price. YMMV, my last house only 1/4 mile away it was unusably slow, like 20/1

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

5G fixed wireless is the way. I could pay Cox $120/mo for a 500Mbps cable line with a data cap, or I could pay Verizon $60/mo for 5G and get 1200Mbps with no BS fake data cap.

5G home internet is cheap because not a lot of people have it yet. Jump on the train now OP before it gets more expensive.

The only catch is that you have to make sure you have good line-of-sight to the tower before you order. That's the key to getting good speeds. Look out your windows and try to find some 5G antennas. In my neighborhood they're installed on the light poles.

That said, even if you can only get LTE service, chances are it'll still be cheaper and faster than the competition in your area. So it still might be worth it to look into it.

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To me in Italy, which generally has shitty internet by europe standards, your rates are horrifingly terrible, expensive, and inexplicably capped. I pity your network

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

To me in Michigan, I also find those rates horrifyingly terrible, expensive, and inexplicably capped.

But here we have a few options for ISPs. In places where they don’t really compete with each other, you can get absurdly terrible plans. And it’s perfectly legal because fuck you, consumer, that’s why.

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago

What will it take for people to burn down all corporate offices?

[–] Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

More like America - Fuck you for living here, bruh. Deal with it.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

In my neighborhood AT&T is offering gigabit fiber-to-the-house for $80/month, IIRC. Been meaning to switch to it, actually.

Edit: my point being, as long as they aren’t colluding to not compete with one another, you can get much better rates.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Make sure you’re not mixing up MBps and Mbps. Internet speed is almost always measured in megabits (Mbps) not megaBytes (MBps), the former being 1/8 of the equivalent megabytes per second.

55 megaBYTES per second is just fine, that’s a full HD movie download in about 3 minutes. 55 megaBITS would be about 24 minutes for the same thing. Would that matter to you? No idea. But if you’re currently at 100, everything would take about twice as long as before the switch regardless.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

May I ask what city and state you live in? These options seem terrible.

[–] Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Des Moines Iowa.

Yes I know the options are terrible and I am aware if alternative ISPs but my apartment management only offers just one ISP. It is not Verizon or any other big name, just some not so well known company with a site design from the 90s in every bad way.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Note to self. Do not move to Des Moines. I pay $60/mo for symmetrical gig (1000 Mbps) with no cap.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

May I humbly suggest Verizon 5G home internet. I checked and it's widely available in Des Moines. Around $45 a month with a discount if you also have Verizon mobile. 300mbps down and like 30 up. No caps. It's just a white box that uses cell towers, so you are not limited to whatever shitty service your apartment complex has contracted with. I used it for 2 or 3 years in Providence, RI, and it was terrific. Cheap, fast enough for my work needs and streaming on 2 TVs, and I never had any problems.

[–] Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Tried doing an area search, only got a form for my address to notify me when service is available.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago

Oh bummer. I used city hall as the address, since that's all I had to go on.

[–] kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Try tmobile's wireless internet. They usually have an option to try free for 30 days. Depending on where you live it can be a great alternative.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe T-Mobile home Internet is good enough?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I was thinking the opposite. I have 1 option for "high speed" in my town, and it's $90 for 12Mbps that rarely actually gets to that speed. I just barely switched to starlink and it's been amazing.

[–] enbee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s pretty cheeks pricing. I pay less than double that for symmetrical gig speed.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I pay $65 a month for Verizon Fios with Symmetrical gigabit

[–] enbee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Tell me where you live. I want to go to there.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Massachusetts lol. Rent will run you $2500 a month, and houses start at $500K. Taxes aren't great either. Welcome!

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I was on 50 max for a while, it's perfectly fine for pretty much everything but big downloads will take longer

(I was gaming online on voice chat at the same time my family was streaming and there wasn't any issue)

I have just upgraded to 500mb for about £35 a month though your pricing is rough

[–] Knuschberkeks@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago

I went from 100 Mb/s to 50 Mb/s about 1.5 years ago, and to be honest it is enough but can be an annoyance. Streaming is no Problem, even two concurrent 4k streams work (tried on youtube, Netflix and Disney+). Downloads just take a while so if you have to download larger files you need to plan ahead a bit. Also, streaming while performing large downloads is tricky. In order to avoid constant buffering you'll need to either significantly reduce your streams quality or set um some priorisation rules on your network.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Speed wise 55Mb/s is fine. Higher speeds are nice for game downloads/etc but that's plenty. I had to live with 3Mb/s until a couple years ago, and we were able to have multiple people watching Netflix/etc on different devices. Not 4k obviously, but surprisingly good video quality for the amount of data available.

The data cap could be a problem though. You'll probably be fine if you don't download many games, but that's an easy cap to hit these days.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would expand this to say that it matters how many people in the household. For one person, 55 Mbps is fine for streaming video and 350 GB is fine for downloads, unless you're d/l multiple AAA games. 350 GB might also cause trouble if you do significant cloud backups.

If you're in a household of 4 people, that 350 GB is likely to bite, and 55 Mbps is likely to struggle if you're all watching something different.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

For context, my family of 5 has used 1.7TB/mo on average this year. That’s gaming, video and music streaming, and regular interneting. And all that without downloading large files most of the time, occasional OS updates withstanding for 10 always on devices. We’re on 500/500 fiber and it never skips a beat. Usually the bottleneck is the WiFi being on WiFi 6 or the server on the other end not being able to keep up (Netflix’s Tysons fight comes to mind). I haven’t seen the need to up it to 1G or 2.5G yet. This is with no enforced cap (we’re lucky enough to have competition on the backbone so it’s unlikely to be enforced). The OPs cap would absolutely be a no go in this setup. Not sure what the OP’s usage and needs are though.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Wow that is expensive.

In NZ I'm on a 300/100 plan with no data cap, for $77/month. That is about $43USD/month.

I have 800/300, no caps, for like 30€/month. Those prices are insane.

[–] fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It definitely is, middle of nowhere Indiana here - I'm getting 1000/1000 for $95 and no cap. But I'm lucky enough to be in a location with competition, lots of areas in the US only have one option so they get charged whatever the ISP wants.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

95 fucking dollars a month?!? And you reckon that's a good deal?

I'd call it Stockholm syndrome but even the Swedish know you're getting fucked up the ass 😂

[–] fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social 1 points 11 hours ago

It's a better fucking deal than $76 for 55mbps lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I pay $15 / mo for 600 Mbps symetric in Thailand. But I go off the beaten path with just my cell as a hotspot which is 10 Mbps for $90 annually. I can do almost anything I want with even those speeds—just make sure you are blocking ads (uBlock + DNS) to stop all the sludge from gauming up your pipes.

[–] Moonguide@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago

I've been gaming and streaming most of my life with sub-30mbps download and sub 15 upload speeds, didn't have symmetrical 50+ until a year ago.

As others have said, you have to plan ahead. If you need to download something large, let it be and go do something else while it does its thing. Streaming high quality on two screens or more is doable but you'll buffer eventually.

You can probably set up some rules on your router to prioritise whatever device you deem most important, however. Although, if its important enough to warrant a rule on your router, it would probably be better to just plug an ethernet cable in anyway.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

I regularly self throttle to 5 Mbs – you’ll survive.

If anything there might be a slim chance that you’ll hit your data cap of 350gb.

Assuming you’re just doing 480/720p streaming you should be good. But if you download 2-3 recentish games that might kick you over.

You might try turning on data gathering on your router if it offers it to see how much you are using.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In terms of bandwith to stream things you won't have a problem. Some high quality stuff can get to around 55Mbps (bits per second). But most streaming services send you the lowest quality shit imaginable so you're probably using less than 20 at any given moment.

That data cap is much more concerning to me, how much streaming do you do? At 10Mbps (typical streaming quality) that's about 3 straight days of watching video which sounds like a lot. But many AAA games are >100GB in size and that's 1/3 of your data right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago

DSL is the only thing available-outside of Starlink--in my area. My service is rated at 25Mbps. For almost everything it's fine. It will take most of a day to download a PS5 game, but it's fine for streaming video.

load more comments
view more: next ›