this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
275 points (98.6% liked)

Today I Learned

18061 readers
1033 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was also noted that while under the Health Act 2006 it is illegal to give out free tobacco in the United Kingdom, Parliament is exempt from this as the Palace of Westminster is a royal palace, and therefore legally exempt from the legislation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There ought to be a documentary made about this, but snuff films are illegal.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

How old are your children?

[–] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I love how UK has so many of these weird traditions that just went too far and now everyone just feels bad to stop it

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 29 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

By that line of reasoning they can also shoot up speedballs whenever they feel like it. Man the people who write the rules just casually flaunting their invincibility to thus aforementioned rules.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

"Rules for thee, writing the rules to control you while snorting stimulants for me" 😌

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's a monarchy. I don't think there was ever an expectation of equality.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 10 points 11 hours ago

Really the complete opposite.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Used to do snuff because my workplace banned smoking anywhere on campus. I'd go in the bathroom and snort a pinch a few times a day.

Hanging out at the guy's cube next to the door, I was horrified to find that you can hear everything in there! Fuck me. There could hear me snorting and see me coming out with red eyes. My supervisor, who was great woman, asked me very nicely if I had a drug problem because of the "tracks" on my arm. (It was a caring thing, not a nosy thing.) LOL, they were burns from working in a rubber plant that hadn't faded yet.

Anyway, that was my first tech support job and I got my hands on a 386 Windows 3.11 machine! Started my career.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I honestly didn't know anyone did snuff any more.

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 20 hours ago

It's still very popular in Germany, you can find it in every tobacco store and most supermarkets.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

It was very popular on high schools in mid 2000s here. I guess easier to hide than smoking.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I'll order some online every now and then. For some reason they sell snuff in Europe and not snus(dip) and in the states it's the opposite.

Snuff is quite invigorating, like snorting a cup of coffee or something. It also makes everything smell nice for a long time as it's scented like fruits and perfume. Of course there's the sneezing and brown boogers too though.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

theres a pub in dublin, ireland that sells it from behind the bar. kinda fun as a novelty. mulligans on poolbeg st

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didnt even know you actually snort the shit. That sounds painful.

[–] Lightsong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah and what did it feel like? Light head like when you had first cig of the day? Or?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

You have to do a very small pinch or you're going to be in literal tears. It's a solid rush, makes your scalp tingle, but no, not like your first cig of the day.

It's also pretty gross. Know those lacy cuffs they wore back in the day? Those were literal snot rags for snuff. You gotta blow out the brown boogers eventually.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

As I said I dont know. I've never seen it in the waking world.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I did it in the mid to late aughts. They sold it at all the gas stations that had the weird flavored Camels that came in tins. Got bored of it eventually but it was widely sold then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Back in the 80s they'd give schoolkids cocaine, pretty sure your boss was bumping.

[–] Breve@pawb.social 7 points 23 hours ago

Get here in time when our day comes

You thought it was gold but it was bronze

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love these old, mostly-harmless traditions.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This one is especially harmless

the last recorded instance of an MP taking snuff was in 1989, when 1.5 ounces (43 g) was taken at a cost of 99p

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago

Honestly, I'd try that just to put my name on the page of that record book.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

interesting, as the article mentions that it is free.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

They are required to keep it full, my guess is they know that refilling cost that.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

I genuinely find that surprising given the corpses that have been haunting that place over the past decade or so

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TIL smoking was banned from the house in the 1600s!

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was before they knew the health problems with secondhand smoke, but also before the invention of fire extinguishers.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Definitely before they knew, but not before some suspected.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Anyone who smokes for more than a few years and is honest with themselves, knows it's very bad for them. You don't need scientific evidence when you can feel it in your chest. It's also very addictive, so it's easy to push all of the physical evidence aside.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I have been smoking regularly for 23 years, minus about a year total of quitting twice. I get regular aerobic and anaerobic exercise from work. Sure it will probably give me cancer, and I smell like an ashtray, but it's not fucked with my health noticeably yet.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How much do you smoke? I smoked a pack per day, and it was obvious within a few years that it was fucking with me. I still had better cardio and fitness than most people I knew, because I was a distance runner, soccer player, martial artist, dirt bike rider, and a bunch of other physical activities that most people don't do, but it was still obvious that it was impairing me.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Depends. If I'm working hard long hours I'll smoke less than a pack. If I'm off work and drinking I can do two whole packs. It balances out to roughly a pack a day.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess you've been lucky then. Most people can feel the negative side effects pretty quickly.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I hear there's been a potential lung cancer vaccine developed in Cuba. Due to the bullshit US embargo, I wonder if we'll ever get it if it works.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There's always something that'll potentially cure cancer, just out of reach. It's like cold fusion.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah I was very skeptical when I first read about it. Here's an abstract, from this year, on pubmed, which is run by the NIH. It claims that the treatment is both safe and effective.

Evidence gathered so far has been in trials in Cuba and the United States for sure, probably other countries as well. I do not think it is FDA approved yet, so it's only being tried on people with stage 3 or 4 cancer who have run out of treatment options. I would love to see a big trial on people where it was caught earlier, I imagine it would be even more effective and could potentially "cure" the cancer.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wait! It's a vaccine that you can administer after you already have the condition and it'll work?!?!

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

That's what all the papers that I looked at said. It's immunotherapy. This is why I'm so excited for them to start trying it on people with less advanced cancer.

I believe there's chemotherapy to prime the body, then 4 shots in two months and then a booster every month? Maybe it's wrong to call it a vaccine but that's what doctors are calling it.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Well, like every other promising cancer treatment I've read about, I hope it becomes available to everyone as soon as possible, and that it's safe and doesn't lead to I Am Legend.

[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Counterblaste is a lovely word. Lots of gravitas.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, of all the Tudor neologisms that didn't really stick, 'counterblaste' is one of the more regrettable ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›