this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
689 points (96.6% liked)

196

16717 readers
2505 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
689
framed rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

I'd sincerely recommend everyone to read his manifesto and think about it a little bit.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lyre@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The thing that gets me is the McDonald's employees tip. Whenever something like this happens the police are flooded with false information and bad tips, this case would have been even moreso due to the politics involved. What made them decide this random person in another state was credible? What about this tip in particular made them say "this information should be followed up on."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Nothing ever happens and everything is a conspiracy

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean they're taking a few liberties there to.my.knowledge but thats close to the official story and it is contusionesque. Unless Luigi wanted to get caught after letting all CEOs cook for a few days.

[–] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Which I think would make sense if he wanted to send a message. For example: he lays low and check press coverage to see if they report on it the way he wants. If he doesn’t get the reaction he’s looking for then he can turn himself in and get another chance to speak to the public more directly.

I can see some logic to it.

His goal wasn’t to get away with murder, his goal was to highlight the system in a way that couldn’t be ignored.

[–] nolefan33@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Like self-immolation, but burn the person who's actually responsible for the problem.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

But why would him be getting caught be necessary here? The motive was pretty obvious simply due to his role as CEO, and the shell casings removed any doubt. It's not like his "manifesto" revealed much about his motives that wasn't obvious from the bullet casings. In terms of sending his message, what did he getting caught actually accomplish?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, everybody does stupid things, and he may have wanted to get caught...

But the entire story is incredibly weird. It looks like those official explanations that say "well, he shot himself on the head and 20 minutes later shot his wife; that's absolutely the case!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 1 day ago

somehow the cops just know from grainy 140p footage

was miraculously not shattered into pieces, which happens to all other 3d printed guns.

the very well-built gun has a particular reload quirk that was seen in the surveillance footage

the doubt about not disposing the gun is a fair point. i suppose he either wanted to seed doubt to the prosecution (as someone else claimed below), or just forgot to plan this part

would naturally spend a long period of time sitting in a public place

fair point, but i think he simply settled into routine. this is corroborated by him being "visibly shaken" and not−well-prepared to someone asking him about the murder

including the additional time it would take for the cops to respond and then arrive

he obviously did not know someone tipped him off

a random McDonald s worker

slight correction: a fellow customer told the worker. if the concern here is that he would hide his face to the worker, well he may have dropped his guard after going back to his seat

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›